only meaningful if we are able to see how we could verify them. moral statements are neither logical or provable by the senses, so they are factually meaningless
what did he argue?
it is important to look at what ethical statements are for, rather than look for 'meaning'. we need to look at how speakers use the word 'right' and 'wrong' dont add anything; they merely convey an approving or disapproving tone.
what term did he?
evince which he used to explain how ethical statements may show an emotionalstate. it does not quite mean the same as expressing an emotional state. we may or may not actually feel the emotion that our words indicate
