Research Method: Experiment – Draganski et al. (2004) Study
An experiment is a research method where an independent variable (IV) is manipulated to observe its effect on a dependent variable (DV), allowing for the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships.
In true experiments, participants are randomly assigned to conditions to control for extraneous variables.
Why is Draganski’s Study an Experiment?
✅ Manipulation of the IV: Learning and practicing juggling (experimental condition) vs. no juggling (control condition). ✅ Measurement of the DV: Changes in gray matter volume measured through MRI scans. ✅ Cause-and-Effect Relationship: The study suggests that learning juggling causes an increase in gray matter, providing experimental evidence for neuroplasticity.
Ethical Consideration: Informed Consent – HM Case Study
Informed consent is an ethical principle requiring that participants fully understand the nature, purpose, and potential risks of a study before agreeing to participate.
Participants must be competent to provide consent and have the right to withdraw at any time.
Issue of Informed Consent in HM’s Case
Due to his memory impairment, HM was unable to remember giving consent to participate in the study over time.
Since he could not form new explicit memories, he could not recall the procedures or agree to continued participation on an ongoing basis.
His legal guardians (family members) and caregivers likely provided consent on his behalf.
Ethical Implications In HM Case Study
Potential Violation: Since informed consent requires continuous awareness and voluntary participation, HM’s inability to remember consenting raises ethical concerns.
Minimization of Harm: Researchers ensured confidentiality and protection from distress, and his identity was kept anonymous (only referred to as HM) until after his death.
Justification: The study provided significant contributions to neuroscience and psychology, improving understanding of memory localization.
Conclusion of HM's case Study In ethical Consideration
HM’s case highlights challenges in obtaining informed consent from individuals with cognitive impairments.
While consent procedures may not have fully met modern ethical standards, researchers took steps to minimize harm and protect HM’s well-being.