Adorno argued high levels of obedience were dispositional/ a psychological disorder (authoritarian personality)
Disagreeing with Milgram’s who suggested we are all capable of extreme obedience
How did Adorno study Authoritarian personality?
Adorno (1950s) studied personality with questionnaires.
Questions revealed unconscious feelings towards minority groups.
Developed the ‘F’/Facism scale
What is one of the factors measured in the F-scale?
Authoritarian Aggression
The tendency to be on the lookout for and condemn, reject and punish people who violate conventional values
What are individuals who score high on the f-scale like?
People who scored highly on the f-scale showed high respect for people with higher social status, had fixed stereotypes for other groups, identified with strong people and disliked weak people
Why do individuals develop an authoritarian personality?
Adorno suggested these people had their personalities shaped early in life by strict authoritative parenting with harsh physical punishments
Anger from this experience was displaced onto others, mainly minority groups
What was one issue with the f-scale questionnaire?
The original f-scale questionnaire lacked internal validity.
All questions were written in one direction, meaning that agreeing to all questions will label someone as authoritarian
Therefore there is response bias
Why is Adorno’s theory of obedience politically problematic?
Authoritarian personality can be seen as a left-wingtheory and inherentlybiased, as it identifies many individuals with a conservativepolitical viewpoint as having a psychologicaldisorder
How does Elm and Milgram’s (1966) research support Adorno?
Interviewed participants who had take part in the first 4 Milgram’s studies.
Showed those that had shocked to the full 450 volts scored higher on the f scale than those who disobeyed
How does Altemeyer’s research support Adorno?
Altemeyer created a new scale to measure the authoritarian personality called the right-wind authoritarian scale.
This fixed many issues with the f scale but still showed an association between high RWA and measures of prejudice
Adorno et al. (1950) believed that unquestioning obedience is a psychological disorder and tried to find its causes in the individuals personality
Adorno et al. concluded that people with an Authoritarian Personality are especially obedient to authority.
They:
Have extreme respects for authority’s and submissiveness to it
express contempt towards people of inferior social status
Authoritarians tend to follow orders and view other groups s responsible for what’s wrong with society
Authoritarian personality originates in childhood due to:
overly strict parenting
expectations of absolute loyalty
impossibly high standards
severe criticism
conditional love
Childhood experiences create resentment and hostility which they can’t express directly on their parents due to fear of punishment.
so the feelings are displaced onto social inferiors
scapegoating
this is a psychodynamic explanation
Adorno et al. (1950) The Authoritarian Personality- Procedure
Investigated 2000 middle class white American’s unconscious attitudes towards other ethnic groups.
Developed several scales including the potential for fascism scale (F-scale)
Dispositional vs situational
Adorno and Milgram’s had the same aim to understand the holocaust, but they came to different conclusions.
Milgram’s was convinced that everyone has the potential to behave in destructively obedient ways given the right circumstances
While Adorno believed that the causes of obedience lies within the individual themselves
Adorno et al. (150) The Authoritarian Personality- Findings
Authoritarians who scored high on the F-scale and other measures identified with ‘strong’ people and were contemptuous of the ‘weak’, they were conscious f their own and others’ status, swing excessive respect and deference to those of higher status.
Authoritarians also had a cognitive style where there was no fuzziness between categories of people
they had fixed and distinctive stereotypes/prejudices about other groups
Research support- A03
Elms and Milgram’s (1966)
interviewed 20 fully obedient particpant from the original study
they score significantly higher on the f-scale than a comparison group of 20 disobedient participants
suggests that obedient people may share many characteristics of people with an Authoritarian personality
Contradicting findings- A03
Subscales of the F-scale showed that obedient participants had characteristics that were unusual for authoritarians.
e.g. they didn’t experience high levels of punishment in childhood
Suggests a complex link and that authoritarianism isn’t a useful predictor of obedience
Authoritarianism can’t explain a whole country’s behaviour- A03
Millions in Germany were obedient and displayed anti-Semitic behaviour but it’s unlikely they all had the same psychological disposition.
It seems unlikely that the majority of German’s had an Authoritarian personality
It’s more likely that the Germans identified with the Nazi state
Therefore SIT may be a better explanation
Political bias- A03
Christie and Jahoda (1954)
suggest the F-scale aims to measure tendency towards extreme right wing ideology
But right and left wing authoritarianism both insist on complete obedience to political authority
So Adorno’s theory isn’t a comprehensive dispositional explanation as it doesn’t explain obedience to left-wing authoritarianism
Flawed evidence- A03
The f-scale has been used in many research studies that have lead to an explanation of obedience based on Authoritarian Personality.
But the F-scale is flawed due to being a questionnaire
e.g. acquiescence bias where people tend to agree with the statements and so are scored as authoritarian
So explanations of obedience based on research with the F-scale may not be valid