describe theory of mind and describe methods used to test it
describe the development of theory of mind
discuss the fundamental skills that underpin theory of mind
theory of mind is the ability to understand that other people have their own thoughts and feelings
mind is a theory in two senses:
theoretical construct; we can only infer peoples mental states from their behaviour
its a construct that allows us to understand (theorise about) other peoples behaviour
understanding the mind: we understand that
we have emotions and desires, and these are linked (e.g. I am happy when a desire is satisfied)
we have knowledge
we have beliefs
an object in the mind is not the same as a real object (e.g. I cannot touch an imagined object)
understanding the mind: we understand that
we have metacognition ( e.g. i forget phone numbers unless I write them down)
our minds determine how we behave
other people also have a mind
other people may have beliefs that are different from our own
how might children develop a theory of mind
harris suggests:
understanding other people results from understanding tourself in their position
this requires the following skills:
self awareness: emerges 18-20 mo
capacity for pretence: pretend play emerges by age 2 years
ability to distinguish real from pretend: stable by 3-4 years. before this, child not sure if others are pretending or not
acuiring a ToM - harris
self awareness - child becomes aware of their own mental states
capacity for pretence - child develops the ability to project their mental states: onto inanimate objects (symbolicplay) onto other people
ability to distinguish real from pretend (child develops realisation that the imagined mental state of other people can differ from their own mental state
development of self-awareness
lewis & brooks-gunn 'rouge experiment'
9-24 mo
placed in front of mirror
mother wipes childs nose
children <15 mo: smile but never touch own nose
childen > 18 months - most children touch own nose
how do children recognise themselves?
possibilities: contingency cues (mirror image moves with self-produced motion)
feature cues (stable facial and bodily features)
lewis & brooks- gunn
asked:
is contingency important (live / pre-recorded video of self)
do children use feature cues (static images of self/ other child)
examined visual preference
found:
Recognition of self develops gradually over first 2yrs of life
Early recognition uses contingency cues (prefer self on live video)
Can use feature cues only >~15mo (prefer pic of self to other child)
consistency of the self over time
povinelli et al
2-4 yr olds
surreptitiously put large sticker on child's head
photographed and videoed them
several minutes delay, then showed pictures and videos to children
only children >3 yrs reached for the sticker
suggests young children not realise self in the past is still the self
suggests awareness of continued existence of self is limited before age 3-4 yrs
evidence from children's speech:
2 yrs: use words relating to the self: 'I', 'me' and own name , can correctly reverse I and you when listening to others
suggests that self-concept is quite well formed when these language developments occur
development of self-awareness
summary
self awareness does not emerge in an all-or-none way:
contingency cues give way to feature cues
awareness of self over time develops
acquiring a theory of mind
sense of self and understanding others
understanding the self provides a way to understand others
evidence for this link 1) empathy and 2) deception
sense of self and understanding others
empathy
bischof kohler (1988) - examined relationship between self-awareness and empathy
tested 16-24 mo
rouge test (like lewis and brooks-gunn)
empathy test (measured empathetic responses when playing with an adult who acts sad)
Found strong correlation - Empathy emerges around 20 mo (cf. emergence of self-awareness)
sense of self and understanding others
deception
requires understanding that other people can have different beliefs from our own
when can children deliberately deceive
cole : deception in 3 and 4 yr old girls
children rated list of 10 gifts from 'best' to 'worst'
then given picture story tasks
after task 1: experimenter gives child 'best' gift; task 2 ' worst' gift
recorded reactions when either - interviewer not present - children show disappointment
interviewer present - most hide disappointment with 'half smile'
sense of self and understanding others:
deception
lewis et al: deception in 3 yr old
33 children
experimenter told child: i've put out a surprise toy. no peeking at it while I leave the room
videotaped child. 29 of 33 peeked!
experimenter reutrns. asks: did you peek?
11 admitted peaking, 11 denied 7 did not answer
when experimenter returned, peekers smiled more than non-peekers
peekers showed most relaxed and smiling expressions
3 yr olds can engage in deliberate verbal and facial deception
false belief tests of children's theory of mind
sally-ann task (location change)
baron-cohen (1985)
2 dolls , sally and anne
sally puts a ball in the basket
sally leaves
anne hides the ball in the box
sally returns
'where will sally look for ball'
4 yr olds: 'basket' - know sally believes ball is in basket
3 yr olds: 'box'
not understand sally has a belief different from their own
false belief tests of childrens theory of mind
smarties task - perner
pencils inside a smarties box
when asked what will your friend think is in the box
4 yr olds: smarties
3 yr olds: pencils
gopnik and astington - 3 yr olds not understand that they once had a different belief from current one
knowledge of mind before -4 years
empathy, deception and false belief studies reveal limitations in understanding of mind before age 4
what do children < 4 years understand about the mind
2 yrs: children use words referring to perception and emotion (e.g. want, see, look)
3 yrs: words referring to cognition (e.g. know, think, remember)
knowledge of mind before 4 yrars
can children distinguish between mental representations and the physical world
shatz et al: examined 3 yr olds speech. concluded 3 year olds have ability to distinguish mental states from physical states, e.g. 'I thought it was an alligator, now i know its a crocodile'
knowledge of the mind before 4 yrs
can children distinguish between mental representations and the physical world
wellman and estes
showed picture stories to 3 yr olds
2 characters: one has a biscuit, the other is thinking about a biscuit
asked: which of the biscuits can be touched? which can be seen by the character which can be seen by another character?
3/4 of 3yr olds responses indicated they can distinguish between mental and physical states
knowledge of mind before -4 yrs
children begin to understand the relationship between seeing and knowing around age 2 yrs
Lempers et al
asked 2 yr olds to show another person a picture glued inside a box
children oriented the box so it was visible for the other person
also, understood that people cannot see picture if eyes are covered
by 3 yrs, realise if they hide an object, other people cannot see it
knowledge of mind before -4 yrs children begin to understand the relationship between seeing and knowing around age 2 yrs
lempers et al
asked 2 yr olds to show another person a picture glued inside a box
children oriented the box so it was visible for other person
also, understood that people cannot see pictures if eyes are covered
by 3 years, realise if they hide an object, other people cannot see it
knowledge of mind before -4 yrs children begin to understand the relationship between seeing and knowing around age 2 yrs
masangkay et al
child shown double-sided picture card (cat/dog)
card placed so child and experimenter see opposite sides of card
asked child what they/ experimenter can see
3 yr olds respond correctly
can children understand the appearance reality distinction ?
children must learn how physical states relate to mental states, but also how mental states relate to physical states: looks can be deceiving
flavell, flavell and green
3,4,5 yr olds given deceptive objects (sponges painted like rocks)
encourages them to play with objects
asked what they look like, what they 'really, really' are
4 and 5 yr olds answered correctly
3 yr olds said objects look like rocks and they are rocks
suggests 4-5 yr olds, can simultaneously represent an object in terms of its appearance + what it is
when is theory of mind achieved
most children succeed on false belief tasks around 4-5 yrs, but several factors affect performance :
wording of the task
language skills
when is theory of mind achieved
most children succeed on false belief tasks around 4-5 yrs, but several factors affect performance :
wording of the task: 'lewis and osborne changed wording on smarties task to: 'what will your friend think is in the box before she opens the lid?' some 3 year olds now succeeded
when is theory of mind achieved
most children succeed on false belief tasks around 4-5 yrs, but several factors affect performance :
language skills
jenkins and astington found children with delayed language skills are delayed in false belief task
woolfe et al found some deaf children are delayed in false belief test
when is theory of mind achieved?
type of social interaction
lewis et al (1996)
studied families in cyprus and crete
measured children's performance on falsebelief task
collected data on children's relationships
found children who succeed on false belief task tended to:
interact more with adults
have more older friends and siblings
suggested interaction with older people may allow children to develop theory of mind skills at a younger age
when is theory of mind achieved:
type of social interaction
brown et al
examined conversations of children around 4 yrs
talked most about thoughts and beliefs with friends, not mother
found talking about thoughts and beliefs correlates with success on false belief task
knowledge of mind after 4 years
what do children older than 4 understand about the mind?
4 year olds understand others beliefs are not always true or same as own. major achievement, but theory of mind skills are not fully developed
"I think that ann thinks that sally things her ball is in the basket"
second order beliefs:
"I believe that person A believes that person B believes X"
"I think that Ann thinks that sally thinks her ball is in the basket
knowledge of mind after 4 yrs
2nd order beliefs:
perner and wimmer - examined performance on a second-order belief task. children only succeeded around age 6 years
knowledge of mind after 4 years:
2) ability to plant false beliefs: deception
perskin (1992): sticker experiment
3,4 and 5 yr olds shown 4 stickers, told: can have favourite, but 2 puppets will choose first:
puppet 1: nice, never take child's favourite.
puppet 2: mean, will.
5 year old lied to mean puppet, 3&4 yr olds told truth so lost sticker
repeated 4 more times:
5 year olds still lied, half of 4 year olds learnt to lie
3yr olds did not learn to lie despite sadness and frustration
suggests younger children not able to generate false belief in another oerspon
different approaches to theory of mind development
importance of reasoning
harris emphasises understanding of own emotions and projecting them onto others is basis for theory of mind
projecting emotions onto others allows child to hypothesis about reasons for those emotions (i.e. beliefs and desires): simulation
simulation involves reasoning about situations that do not exist (called counterfactual reasoning)
suggests the possibility that young children's failure in false belief tasks may be due to limitations in reasoning abilities
different approaches to theory of mind development
importance of reasoning
riggs et al
read story to 3 &4 yr olds
maxi & his mum put chocolate in the cupboard. maxi goes to school. mother uses some chocolate to make cake. puts remainder in frige. maxi comes home
asked either:
where does maxi think the chocolate is?
if mum had not made a cake, where would the chocolate be?
both require hypothetical reasoning
approx. all children answered consistently (whether right or wrong)
suggests failure on f.b. tasks is due to reasoning limitation, not failure to understand mental representations
different approaches to theory of mind development
2) importance of representational ability
wellman emphasis development of representational ability as an important factor
2 yr olds: not able to form representation of others beliefs
3 yr olds: able to represent others' beliefs, but only as a true copy of the world (not realise beliefs are interpretations of world)
4 yr olds: realise beliefs represent an interpretation of the world, not a true copy of the world: i.e. achieve knowledge about representations ('metarepresentation' perner)