Laboratory experiments- controlled environment, manipulates independent variable and measures it's effect on dependent variable, extraneous variables controlled
Strengths of lab experiments:
High internal validity- control of variables means cause and effect can be determined
Highly replicable- increases reliability of results
Limitations of lab experiments:
Lowgeneralisability-artificial settings means results can't be applied to other settings
Lowecological validity- due to low generalisability
Lowmundane realism- tasks done in the setting won't be the same as normal tasks
Risk of demand characteristics- participants are aware they are being studied due to the setting
Field experiments- natural setting, manipulates independent variables and measure the effect on dependent variables
Strengths of field experiments:
Highermundane realism- tasks are done in a real-life setting where they might occur normally
Higherecological validity- done in a 'normal' setting, can be more generalisable
Limitations of field experiments:
Lesscontrol over variables- can be more difficult to establish link between cause and effect
Ethical issues- participants may not consent to being a part of the study, their privacy could be jeopardised
Natural experiments- independent variable is naturally occurring in the environment and not manipulated by the researcher, effect on dependent variable is measured
Strengths of natural experiments:
Allows research into otherwise unethical topics
Highecological validity- real-life setting is more generalisable
Limitations of natural experiments:
Lowinternal validity- independent variable isn't manipulated, so cause and effect can't be determined
Difficult to replicate- lower reliability
Participants can't be randomly allocated
Quasi experiments- independent variable isn't manipulated by the researcher, it naturally exists in participants and it's effect on the dependent variable is measured
Strengths of quasi experiments:
Controlled- increases replicability which also increases reliability
Limitations of quasi experiments:
Lowinternal validity- independent variable isn't manipulated so cause and effect can't be determined
Participants aren't randomly allocated
Risk of confounding variables- lowers internal validity
Repeated measures- the same pps take part in each condition of the experiment
Strengths of repeated measures:
Less pps needed, lower risk of participant variables, less time consuming, easy to compare results between conditions (to same pps)
Limitations of repeated measures:
Higher risk of demand characteristics (pps might change behaviour due to their impressions of what the study might be), order effects (more practise or fatigue) which could lead to skewed results or drop-outs which wastes resources
Independent groups- different, randomly allocated participants take part in each experimental condition
Strengths of independent groups:
Less risk of demand characteristics, no order effects because pps don't do both conditions
Limitations of independent groups:
More pps are required, risk of participant variables, harder to compare results between conditions
Matchedpairs- pps are assessed on key variables relevant to the study, then matched into a pair with a pp in another condition based on the similarkey variable
Strengths of matched pairs:
Low risk of participant variables, no order effects, lower risk of demand characteristics, easy to compare results between conditions
Limitations of matched pairs:
Time-consuming to match pps, hard to exactly match pps
Counterbalancing-lowering the possibility of extraneous variables in a repeated measures design by splitting the pps group in half- one group will do condition 1 first then condition 2, the other group will do condition 2 first then condition 1, which will balance out any order effects
Participant variables- individualdifferences between pps which might affect the results/ performance of an experiment