easy

• Content analysis is the major point or meaning of the primary source in its historical context.
• Context can assist us to comprehend what inspires individuals to behave the way they do when we analyze historical events.
• Contextual analysis involves understanding the historical situation in which the primary source was produced, including the time and place where it was written, the situation or background of the event, the intent of the author and his authority on the subject, and its relevance and importance today.
• Historical narrative cannot be fully appreciated or understood without historical context.
• The term "History" was derived from the Greek word "Historia" which means acquired knowledge through inquiry and investigation.
• History as a disciplined existed for around 2,400 years and is as old as mathematics and philosophy.
• Without historical context, we are only seeing a piece of the scene and not fully understanding the influence of the time and place in which a situation occurred.
• The term "History" was then adapted to classical Latin where it acquired a new definition.
• In classical Latin, "Historia" became known as the account of the past of a person or a group of people through written documents and historical evidence.
• History can refer to everything that has happened in the past and is related to a kind of research or inquiry.
• President Corazon Aquino's speech before the US Congress (Speech) is also a primary source for midterms.
• History is a discipline or a field of study and investigation that is primarily concerned with human activities done in the past.
• Recording the past through historical sources was pioneered by ancient Greek Historian Herodotus with the purpose of describing the deeds of men in the past for posterity or future use.
• The successor of Herodotus was Thucydides, known as the Father of Scientific History, who highlighted the importance of the systematic and impartial collection of evidence as an essential prerequisite in writing history.
• Thucydides emphasized that the only reliable sources of history were testimonies of eyewitnesses.
• The Greeks realized that history is vast and cannot be captured in the memory of a single generation.
• The Greeks developed a new historical method that is not limited to collecting eyewitness testimonies through a compilation of various works and records kept by different people at different places and times.
• By the 19th century, a particular school of thought emerged, Positivism, which asserts that real knowledge lies in the actual observation of facts.
• Pantayong Pananaw comes from two Filipino root words, "tayo" and "pananaw".
• Language as proposed by the advocates of Pantayong Pananaw serves as the root and backbone of the Filipino experience.
• History helps us understand the problems of the present.
• "Pananaw" means perspective or outlook in Filipino.
• History and historiography should not be confused with each other.
• History can help one develop tolerance and open-mindedness.
• Pantayong Pananaw is the intellectual leader of the movement.
• Historiography is the writing of history, especially the writing of history based on the critical examination of sources, the selection of particular details from the authentic materials in those sources, and the synthesis of those details into a narrative that stands the test of critical examination.
• Historiography lets the students have a better understanding of history.
• Historiography is the history of history.
• History helps us better understand all human behaviors and all aspects of the human condition.
• History provides a source of personal and social identity.
• Primary and secondary sources of historical records are different and should be analyzed differently.
• The criteria for evaluating primary and secondary sources materials include the date of production, localization, authorship, analysis, integrity, and credibility.
• Primary sources are evaluated based on six points of inquiries: date, localization, authorship, analysis, integrity, and credibility.
• When conducting external criticism of a document, the quality of the paper, the type of the ink, and the language and words used in the material are examined among others.
• Internal criticism refers to the examination of the truthfulness of the evidence, weighing the testimony of the document in relation to the truth.
• External criticism is the practice of verifying the authenticity of evidence by examining its physical characteristics, consistency with the historical characteristic of the time when it was produced, and the materials used for the evidence.
• Internal criticism examines the truthfulness and factuality of the evidence by looking at the author of the source, its context, the agenda behind its creation, the knowledge which informed it, and its intended purpose among others.
• Internal criticism looks at the truthfulness and factuality of the evidence by looking at the author of the source, its context, the agenda behind its creation, the knowledge which informed it, and its intended purpose among others.
• Internal criticism is the examination of the truthfulness of the evidence, looking at the content of the source and examining the circumstances of its production.
• Primary sources can age in centuries and should be able to withstand both internal and external criticism.