Karl Popper: empiricists that propose a deductive way of framing science, and also a method of control which is not aimed to having positive evidence for supporting a theory put negative evidence.
The validity of general statements based on particular ones is questioned due to the gap between observation (limited) and the universality of general statements.
The principle of induction is not a tautology or an analytic statement, it must be a synthetic statement that needs to be satisfied the principle of induction.
If the experiment gives a positive outcome, the theory has passed its test, but if the experiment gives negative outcomes, the statements and the theory will be falsified.
In the theory of gravity, the prediction is that if I leave an object it will fall down, and the test is to actually leave the object and observe it fall down.
Popper believes that we have an inborn knowledge (inborn expectations) that if disappointed create our first problem and the growth of our knowledge may therefore be described as consisting throughout of corrections and modification of previous knowledge.
Popper believes that we are living int he centre of what he calls a Horizon of expectation: the sum total of our expectations, whether these are subconscious, conscious or explicitly stated.
We approach reality on the ground of our own horizon of expectation, everyone has one: which contains expectations, hypothesis, innate knowledge, and our way of approach knowledge.
Popper's rationalism is connected to Evolutionary epistemology, a backward pattern including: theory, implicit expectations, innate knowledge, physiology of sense organs, and pre-categorization experience.