Control, DV and IV are important aspects of research design.
Extraneous variables are any variable other than the independent variable that might affect the dependent variable and thus affect the results.
Confounding variables are extraneous variables that are important enough to cause a change in the dependent variable.
Situational variables are extraneous variables connected with the research, such as temperature, day lighting, materials, etc.
Participant variables are extraneous variables connected with the research participants, such as age, intelligence, gender, etc.
Random allocation of participants to their groups, for example in an independent measures design, is an extremely important process in psychological research.
Random allocation greatly decreases the possibility that participant variables in the form of individual differences, such as mathematical ability, will adversely affect the results.
To combat the problem of order effects with repeated measures design, researchers can counterbalance the order of the conditions.
Randomisation is when trials are presented in a random order to avoid any bias that the order of the trials might present.
Standardisation is the process in which all situational variables of a procedure used in research are kept identical, so that methods are sensitive to any change in performance.
Demand characteristics occur when the participants try to make sense of the research and change their behaviour accordingly to support what they believe are the aims of the investigation.
Demand characteristics are a problem as the participants act in a way to support the hypothesis rather than displaying natural behaviour, making the results lack validity.
Investigator effects are where a researcher (consciously or unconsciously) acts in a way to support their prediction.
Investigator effects can be a problem when observing events that can be interpreted in more than one way.
Investigator effects are best controlled by not allowing either the participants or the researcher (investigator) to know the aim of the research and/or identity of the IV.
This is achieved by using a double-blind experimental technique.
In a double-blind experimental technique, only the person who originally designed the experiment knows the true aim, and a measure of deception has been used so that the participants and researcher are not aware.