A person or state that pays tribute to another state or ruler
Holy War
Any war regarded as a religious act or is in some way set in a direct relation to religion
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre is a church built on the traditional site of Jesus' Crucifixion and burial
Crusade
The term 'crusade' was not known contemporarily, and the idea was often referred to as iter or expeditio
The idea of colonies as a result of the crusade does not link directly with modern imperialism and had solely economic aims
Some argued that the crusades were equally a cultural phenomenon as 'colonies' weren't politically linked with their 'mother country'
The emphasis on the development of canon law prioritised the struggle over that of the struggle with empire, hence the 'politico-diplomatic' aspect of the first crusade tends to get overlooked
Anna Comnena (Byzantine historian): 'There were two main reasons for the war, the rich went to get richer and the poor to save their souls'
This plays into Marxist interpretations
Early Christians
They were used to profane wars and thus the question surrounding them is less whether religion could be a valid basis for war but could Christians fight at all?
The situation had changed with Constantine who made sure military service was 'unobjectionable'
This led to the development of violence against Pagans
Military saints developed early in Greek Churches e.g. Demetrius, Theodore but were largely unknown to the West
Bellum iustum
Augustine believed that all war was rooted in evil and bellum iustum didn't exist as one side had to be the aggressors
Augustine made the point that individual soldiers, if unaware of why they had to fight, were excluded from condemnation
Religion was a universal experience hence it attracted a wide variety of people without concerns for religious gain
The first call to arms was addressed to the Knighthood as a body not individuals
Later crusades could draw people in with the established idea of a crusade and the notion of protecting land in hostile areas
The idea of piety from the crusades created an idea that was spread throughout
Pope Urban popularised the idea of salvation through violence on behalf of God
Participants had doubts about this unprecedented view and were penitent about it
60,000 people and 6-7,000 knights gathered at Nicea in June 1097
The 100,000 people who were stirred from their houses made it so it was rare for people to be unaware of the situation at hand
While those like Godfrey of Bouillon provided an army, no one from the mouvance of William appeared to participate
Patronage structures played deeply into the decision of high class men to join the crusade
Urban's call created a theological/ideological pressure on common people
Ideology only influenced people's decisions for a short while, as we can see from land owners
Urban's call to war was not one which intended to start the crusades but rather it ended up providing a narrow and easy way to clear yourself of sin
People did refuse to respond to the call, such as Fulk IV Le Réchin and Duke William IX of Aquitaine
The House of Roucy had a strong tradition of participation in holy wars but didn't partake in the crusades, despite strong support for the papacy
There were huge differences among those who were considered knights, some were landed, some simply by name, and some only had a horse
It is hard to generalise who exactly Urban II was trying to appeal to
Knights at the lowest level were like 'superior peasants' but at the highest they were 'of considerable status'
Debate over main reason for 1st Crusade
Recovery of Holy Sepulcher or aid Eastern Christians?
The 1st Crusade wasn't a war to encourage conversion, as this went against both Christian doctrine and The Jihad but rather to turn people into tributaries
Armies were not stable but the armies of the princes were fluid, which proved to be characteristic of the first crusade
Peter the Hermit
An 'odd-job man' who carried out activities such as prayers in Jerusalem and being an ambassador for unbelievers, and led the first crusading army to failure
Peter was never the sole effective commander of the 'People's Crusade'
Peter arrived late as he could not handle such a range of people, and the Emperor Alexius forced them into Asia Minor as they were causing mass destruction such as ransacking houses and churches
2nd Crusade
5 Expeditions, 2 Armies (manned by Emperor Conrad III and King Louis VII of France), Same route overland from Balkans to Constantinople