Modern nationalism in Europe was associated with the formation of nation-states
It meant a change in people's understanding of who they were and what defined their identity and sense of belonging
In most countries, the making of this new national identity was a long process
New symbols, icons, songs, and ideas forged new links and redefined the boundaries of communities
In India, modern nationalism emerged in connection to the anti-colonial movement
People discovered their unity in the process of struggling against colonialism
The sense of being oppressed under colonialism provided a shared bond among different groups
Each class and group felt the effects of colonialism differently, with varied experiences and notions of freedom
The Congress under Mahatma Gandhi tried to unite these groups within one movement, although unity did not come without conflict
The growth of nationalism in India up to the first decade of the twentieth century has been previously studied
From the 1920s, the focus is on the Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience Movements in India
The Congress aimed to develop the national movement
Different social groups participated in the movement
Nationalism captured the imagination of the people
After the First World War, there was a new economic and political situation in India
Defence expenditure increased significantly and was financed by war loans and increasing taxes
Customs duties were raised and income tax was introduced
Prices doubled between 1913 and 1918, leading to extreme hardship for the common people
Villages were required to supply soldiers, and forced recruitment in rural areas caused widespread anger
In 1918-19 and 1920-21, crops failed in many parts of India, resulting in acute food shortages
An influenza epidemic accompanied the food shortages
According to the census of 1921, 12 to 13 million people perished due to famines and the epidemic
Mahatma Gandhi returned to India in January 1915 from South Africa
Gandhi introduced the idea of satyagraha, emphasizing the power of truth and the need to search for truth
Satyagraha suggested that physical force was not necessary to fight injustice, and that non-violence could win the battle
The concept involved appealing to the conscience of the oppressor rather than using violence
Gandhi believed that non-violence could unite all Indians
In 1916, Gandhi organised a satyagraha movement in Champaran, Bihar, to inspire peasants to struggle against the oppressive plantation system
In 1917, Gandhi organised a satyagraha to support the peasants of the Kheda district of Gujarat, who were affected by crop failure and a plague epidemic
In 1918, Gandhi went to Ahmedabad to organise a satyagraha movement among cotton mill workers
Mahatma Gandhi distinguishes between passive resistance and Satyagraha
Passive resistance is considered the weapon of the weak, while Satyagraha can only be used by the strong
Satyagraha is not passive resistance; it requires intense activity
The movement in South Africa led by Gandhi was active, not passive
Satyagraha is not physical force
A satyagrahi does not inflict pain on the adversary or seek their destruction
In the use of satyagraha, there is no ill-will
Satyagraha is based on pure soul-force
Truth is the essence of the soul, which is why this force is called satyagraha