ArthurBirling is the head of the Birling household and an active member of the community in Brumley
He has made himself very wealthy by being a "hard headed business man" and thinks he may be in line for a knighthood
At the start of the play he comes across as being arrogant, making long speeches about his predictions for the future.
He also makes assertions about how a man should look out for number one and not waste time helping others.
Sybil, his wife, is his 'social superior' and it is hinted that he is self-conscious about being from a more working-class background.
He is materialistic and possessive and also has old fashioned views about women
Mr Birling is shaken by the investigation and is shocked by the behaviour of his son Eric. However, he doesn’t learn any lessons during the course of the play.
When it seems that the Inspector might have been an imposter he is overjoyed and mocks the others for having been 'tricked' by the investigation.
Mr Birling is presented as a foolish and naive man which helps to form the audience's negative opinions of him
Mr Birling is a business man whose main concern is making money. This is what is most important to him and he comes across as being greedy (capitalism)
Birling is portrayed as a character who cares only for himself and his family, which cements the audience perspective of him being egotistical and a excessive capitalist
Is firmly entrenched with 1912 ante-bellum (prewar) English social elite.
Birling's dominant position within a static society is portrayed through his patriarchal business, marriage to MrsBirling and his indifference to Sheila's concerns
Priestley exhibits Arthur Birling as the living embodiment of the capitalist ideology
"Heavy looking" symbolises greed and frequently displays his "portentous attitude"
He has a clear pompous perspective which is evident through his immediate reclamation of the spotlight
Arthur's lower class origins cause insecurity as he constantly reminds people of his societal place.
His "provincial" speech could indicate a lack of sophistication
Priestley's opening description of Birling's house indicates the cosmetic nature of their comfort
Birling compensates for his "provincial speech" and unrefined etiquette through his "substantial" house
Desire to ensure his status of belonging to the upper echelons of society (high class) is derived from his initial social inferiority, before he started his business
Birling is condemned by higher class men due to his lack of aristocratic background (nouveau riche)
Desire to dismiss Eva's suicide is catalysed by pressure of maintaining his public image
Priestley uses Arthur as a method to critique capitalism and reveal the cycle of oppression due to classism
Arthur remains a static character because Priestley intends him to be a vehicle for capitalism
Birling's attempts to condescend the inspector create a facade of authority to mask his own insecurity
Mr Birling is portrayed as arrogant and ignorant. We see this when his speech is diluted with dashes and hesitations
There is noticeable tension between Gerald and Arthur and that increases his ostentatious tendencies.
Mr Birling is a foil to the Inspector . They compare ideologies that each character represents.
Mr Birling's relationship with his son lacks familial connections and Eric opposes his father's morals
Mr Birling attempts to lecture Eric and influence him with capitalist and individualistic notions
There is a divide between Sybil and Arthur as they were potentially married for her social status rather than love(transactional marriage)
Mr Birling intends to live in the same fashion before the Inspector's arrival (cycle of immorality)
Arthur feels instant catharsis when the prospect of no criminal record is proposed