Critique of Current Crash Causation Analysis Methods
Recent studies question the adequacy of current methods for analyzing crash causation, suggesting a need to link causes with countermeasures
There's a call to contextualize human errors, failures, and violations within the environment in which they occur, aiming to change behavior in a safer direction by adapting the environment
Police registration forms are not designed to identify the underlying causes of crashes but rather to determine the guilty party
Crashes typically result from a combination of factors, making it difficult to pinpoint a single cause
Unintentional errors are likely more prevalent as crash causes, as intentional offending rarely leads directly to a crash. However, violations can increase the risk of errors and their severity
Road safety is typically measured by the number of road crashes, casualties, and their negative consequences. Subjective perceptions of road safety, such as fears of being involved in a crash, are also sometimes considered
A widely accepted definition of a road traffic crash involves a collision or incident on a public road resulting in damage to objects and/or injury to people involving at least one moving vehicle
Road deaths are defined internationally as someone who dies immediately or within 30 days as a result of a road crash, excluding suicides
Serious crashes on rural roads are often single-vehicle crashes caused by inappropriate speeds, combined with factors like alcohol consumption, distraction, and fatigue. Roadside design also contributes to the severity of outcomes
Urban roads see a high number of fatalities, primarily due to transverse conflicts (side impacts) where mass differentials and vulnerability of road users play significant roles
Motorways are the safest roads due to high-quality design and restrictions on slow-moving traffic
Crash registration is typically carried out by the police, but crash statistics are often incomplete due to underreporting. Crashes involving non-motorized transport and alcohol-related crashes are particularly prone to underreporting
Data collections also suffer from biases, with less severe injuries being more underreported
1. Driver inattention and errors are prevalent factors leading to crashes, often occurring just prior to the onset of conflict
2. Observational systems installed in vehicles have provided insights into everyday driving behavior, revealing instances of driver inattention and errors that may not be captured in police reports
Motorized two-wheelers, such as motorcycles and mopeds, have the highest fatality and injury risk in road traffic due to their combination of high speed, low mass, and poor crash protection
Young people are at a higher risk in traffic due to age-specific characteristics, lack of driving experience, and their preference for two-wheelers
Elderly road users are also at a higher risk due to physical frailty
1. Serious injuries are often defined using the Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS), with MAIS 3+ considered serious. The European Union aims to reduce both road fatalities and serious injuries by using MAIS3+ as a criterion
2. Methods for estimating serious injuries include corrections on police data, hospital data, and linked police and hospital data
1. Estimating road crash costs is important for policy-making and can be compared with other impacts of traffic and transport as well as other public health issues
2. Common cost categories include medical costs, production loss, human costs, property damage, and settlement costs
3. Human costs involve estimating the value of a statistical life (VOSL) and the value of a statistical life
1. Designing roads for high-speed conditions, such as motorways, requires both physical (e.g., separation of driving directions, grade-separated intersections) and psychological (e.g., predictable design) considerations to manage high speeds safely
2. In areas where vulnerable road users and motorized traffic share space, low-risk conditions can only be achieved with low traveling speeds
The socioeconomic costs of road crashes range from 0.5% to 6.0% of GDP in high-income countries and from 1.1% to 2.9% in low- and middle-income countries
The Netherlands experienced a 50% reduction in the mortality rate from 1995 to 2007, attributed to various factors such as infrastructural adaptations, vehicle safety improvements, and enhanced legislation and enforcement
Estimating the value of a statistical life (VOSL) and the value of a statistical serious injury (VSSI) reflecting people's willingness to pay for lower risks
The reduction in road deaths is not solely due to decreased exposure (distance traveled), but also a result of interventions that reduce the fatality rate
The Swedish perspective introduced the idea of considering exposure as a variable in understanding road safety, emphasizing the need to address the frequency of crashes relative to exposure
Initially, crashes were attributed to individual fault, leading to legal and insurance implications. Subsequently, the understanding shifted towards recognizing multiple contributing factors to crashes
Since 1970, many high-income countries have made significant progress in reducing road fatalities. However, progress has slowed in the last decade, except for 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic
Despite increased mobility, the Netherlands has seen a significant decline in traffic fatalities. For instance, between 2010 and 2020, there were just over 600 traffic deaths annually, compared to 3,264 deaths in 1972