Custodial sentancing: dealing

Cards (17)

  • custodial sentencing involves a convicted offender spending time in prison or other closed institutions
  • what are the 4 main reasons for custodial sentencing?
    1. deterrence
    2. incapacitation
    3. retribution
    4. rehabilitation
  • Deterrence: reasons for custodial sentencing
    the unpleasant experience of prison is designed to put off the individual from engaging in offending behaviour
    • works on 2 levels: general deterrence and individual deterrence
    • based on the behaviourist idea of conditioning through punishment
  • general deterrence 

    aims to send a broad message to members of a given society that crime will not be tolerated
  • individual deterrence
    prevents the individual from repeating the same crime in light of their experience
  • incapacitation: reasons for custodial sentencing 

    the offender is taken out of society to prevent reoffending as a means of protecting the public
    • depends on the severity
  • retribution: reasons for custodial sentencing
    society is enacting revenge for the crime by making the offender suffer.
    • punishment should be equal to the seriousness of the crime
    • many people view other alternatives as soft options
  • rehabilitation: reasons for custodial sentencing
    many commentators would see the main objective of prison is to reform
    • offenders should leave prison better adjusted and ready to take their place back in society
    • should provide opportunities to develop skills and access treatment for drug addiction while reflecting on crime
  • the psychological effects of custodial sentencing
    1. stress and depression
    2. institutionalisation
    3. Prisonisation
  • stress/depression: psychological effects of custodial sentencing
    suicide rates are considerably higher in prison than in the general population
    • also increases the risk of psychological disturbance following release
  • institutionalisation: psychological effects of custodial sentencing 

    inmates may become accustomed to the norms and routines of prison leading them to be no longer able to function following their release
  • prisonisation: psychological effects of custodial sentencing
    behaviour that may be considered unacceptable in the outside world may be encouraged or rewarded inside the prison walls
  • recidivism
    refers to reoffending
  • the problem with recidivism
    statistics show that 57% of offenders will re-offend within a year
    • the UK and the US have the highest rates of recidivism
    • stark contrast to Norway where the reoffending rate is the lowest - Norway has more emphasis on rehabilitation
    • commentators say that Norway's approach si too soft
  • weakness for custodial sentencing is that there is evidence to support the psychological effects
    Bartol (1995)
    • suggests that for many offenders imprisonment can be 'brutal and demeaning'
    • suicide rates have increased to around 15x higher than those in Gen pop
    prison reform trust
    • found that 25% of women and 15% of men reported symptoms of psychosis
    suggesting that custodial sentencing is not effective in rehabilitating the individual, particularly those who are psychologically vulnerable
  • Weakness of custodial sentencing: individual differences
    cannot assume that all offenders will act the same way
    • different prisons have different regimes therefore offenders will have different experiences
    • many of those convicted may have had pre-existing psychological and emotional difficulties at the time they were convicted
  • strength of custodial sentencing: opportunities for training and treatment
    many prisoners access education and training whilst in prison increasing the possibility they will find employment upon release.
    • treatment programs such as anger management schemes and social skill training may reduce the likelihood of recidivism
    • suggesting that prison is a worthwhile experience
    HOWEVER, many prisons may lack the resources to provide these programs, and long-term benefits do not have concludable evidence