They showed participants trigrams and then told them to count back in 3's so as to block the rehearsal loop to find out how long the duration of STM is. After 3 seconds around 90% recalled them correctly but after 18 seconds this reduced to less than 10%
Supports the Multi store Model explanation of memory
Aim: to provide evidence to support the multi store explanation of memory.
Murdock presented participants with a list of words at a rate of about one second. He found that participants recall words from the beginning(known as the primacy effect) and the end of the list (positions 1,2,3 and 18,19,20)
Murdock claimed that the recency effect is evidence to show that the last few words are still in the term store and the primacy effect is evidence to show that the first few words were still in the long-term store.
Milner's patient, H.M, following brain surgery to cure him eof pilepsy, the patient suffered damage to his memory. Given some information, he could remember it as long as he attended to it. His STM was normal. However, he seemed unable to store new information in LTM. The inability to store new information in LTM after brain damage is called anterograde amnesia.
This suggests that brain damage affected LTM but not STM, in which the 2 stores must be separate and distinct. This evidence supports the Multi-store model.
Bartlett suggests that we only store some elements of new experiences in memory, and, when we remember the events we reconstruct them, filling in missing info with our own schemas.
Schema: Our own stored opinions, prejudices, expectations, stereotypes that help us reconstruct memories.
Aim: To find out whether or not how the word was processed affected how well it was recalled.
Method: Participants questions about specific words and were asked to answer Yes/No. some questions required semantic processing; others required phonetic processing and visual processing. participant's had to then recognise which words they had already seen.
Results: words that require semantic processing were more likely to be remembered, the least remembered words were those that required visual processing.
Conclusion: Processing material in a deep way, recall is better.
When straight lines are angled so they would converge (come together) at a point on the horizon. This point is known as the vanishing point, useful if we want to show distance in a landscape.
Our brain detects the differences in our eye muscles. We focus our eyes differently in order to see closer objects, to how we focus them to see objects that are further away. The brain detects the differences in the muscles and uses it as a cue for distance.
Comparing the images received by the eyes. If something is close to us, there is quite a difference in what each eye sees - the left and the right eye view slightly different images. If something is further away, there will be less of a difference between the two images.
Wrongly applying the 'rules' of depth perception. Sometimes our brain detects distance when it is not actually there. For example the Muller Lyer illusion when our brain interprets the top line as longer, however they are the same size.