a set of definitions of a given science; a framework of assumptions, principles and methods
kuhn - paradigms are essentially a set of norms or a kind of culture that scientists come to accept through socialisation
a science can't exist without a shared paradigm, and without one there is purely rival schools of thought
normal science
kuhn - normal science involves problem-solving where paradigms provide the questions and a broad sense of the asnwers and scientists fill in the gaps
this is an advantage as scientists agree on the basics so are able to get on with the productive aspects of science
watkins - this contrasts with popper's view that falsification is what makes science unique
scientific revolutions
not all puzzle-solving is successful and scientists find anomalies that contradict with their paradigms, which means they lose confidence in that paradigm
this places science in crisis as it loses its previously taken-for-granted foundations and causes arguments and efforts to reformulate the paradigm
rival paradigms are created which kuhn suggests can't be compared to one another, so neither will accept criticism or accept that they are wrong
post-scientific revolution
eventually a new paradigm wins out over the others and is accepted by the scientific community, so the practice can resume with a different set of norms
kuhn - this is an irrational process similar to religious conversion and generally gains support from younger scientists first because they have less to lose from the change
contrasts with popper's view that the scientific community is open and rational
implications for sociology
sociology is currently pre-paradigmatic and so pre-scientific as there is no common perspective or methodology, and can only become one if these disagreements are concluded
there are doubts about whether this is even possible as even political differences prevent this, which will continue to exist
there are even disagreements within different perspectives eg. liberal v radical feminism
postmodernists suggest paradigms aren't desirable in sociology because they resemble meta-narratives