Learning & memory come hand in hand – Need memory to support learning and vice versa
Memory processes
What can we do with info received to increase likelihood of retrieving memory later on
Both explicit and implicit learning stored in LTM
Explicit learning
Conscious, intentional learning of new info
Explicit learning
Sitting in a lecture trying to encode what the professor is saying
Implicit learning
Unconscious, incidental learning without trying or awareness
Implicit learning
Learning Korean vocabulary while watching a drama, riding a bicycle, driving, swimming, typing on a keyboard without looking
Assessing Implicit learning
Serial Reaction Time Task
Serial Reaction Time Task
Subjects press buttons corresponding to the position of a blue dot as fast as possible
Implicit learning is relatively easy to do but hard to verbalize accurately
Characteristics of Implicit learning
Robustness, Age independence, IQ independence, Low variability in individuals, Common to most species
Neural correlates of learning
Implicit learning associated with the striatum, Explicit learning associated with 2 areas in frontal lobes, hippocampus, and surrounding medial temporal lobes
No double dissociation between implicit and explicit learning
H.M. Henry Molaison study: Removal of hippocampus led to anterograde amnesia
More elaborate processing leads to better remembrance
Ways of processing words
Shallower - Structural processing (appearance)
Phonemic processing (sound)
Deeper - Semantic processing (meaning)
Results show an increase in ability to remember words when processing at a deeper level (meaning) with the highest percentage
Survival processing effect study conducted by Nairne et al., 2007
Survival processing study
1. Participants asked to evaluate 30 nouns
2. 3 conditions: Condition 1 - Imagine you are stranded. Condition 2 - Imagine you are moving overseas. Condition 3 (control) - Evaluate the pleasantness of the words’ referents
3. Results show words related to survival had the highest proportion of recall
Evolutionary perspective
Humans evolved to give advantage to processing about survival, leading to deeper processing of survival-related concepts
Transfer Appropriate Processing study by Morris et al., 1977
Transfer Appropriate Processing study
1. Participants learned words at shallow (sound) level or deep (meaning) level
2. Tested with either standard recognition memory task or rhythm recognition task
3. Results show a higher proportion of recognition when there is a match between the way information was encoded and tested
Distinctiveness study by Kirchoff et al., 2005
Distinctiveness study
Distinctive information associated with strong, unique, unusual cues is less prone to interference and leads to better remembrance
Testing Effect study by Roediger & Karpicke, 2006
Testing Effect study
1. Method of studying - Restudy vs self-test study
2. Results show no universal advantage, short retention favors studying 4 times, longer retention favors repeated testing for more robust memory
Test Format Effects study by Kang et al., 2007
Test Format Effects study
1. Participants tested via Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) or Short Answer Questions (SAQ)
2. Results show SAQ with feedback is more effective in enhancing student learning and fosters better long-term retention of information
Declarative vs Nondeclarative memory
Declarative memory
Nondeclarative memory
Declarative EPISODIC memory
Metaphorical time-travel in Declarative EPISODIC memory
Constructive nature of Declarative EPISODIC memory