Language policy began with a philosophy of modernization through national development and focused more on linguistic homogeneity than language preservation
The MTB-MLE policy in the Philippines is indicative of this shift in perspective at a national level, yet the local-level perspective is notably absent from the discussion
Openings in language policy where content and media for instruction utilize local, contextualized viewpoints rather than the majority, decontextualized perspectives traditionally observed in educational systems
The language selections that people actually make, including the sound, word, and grammatical choices made within a community, as well as the societal rules about when and where different varieties of language should be used
Ricento and Hornberger's language policy and planning model
Considers actors within each of the national, institutional, and interpersonal levels, and how reform implementation approaches from the national or community level interact to influence implementation at the classroom level
The multidirectional nature of language interpretation and implementation is a necessary, but conflict-laden, process that suggests language policy is not simply defined by national level statements
The United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights (1948) affirmed the right to education without discrimination, including on the grounds of language
The level of second language proficiency acquired by a child is a function of the child's level of proficiency in the first language at the point when intensive second language instruction begins
Research on literacy outcomes related to mother tongue instruction has been mostly done in North America and Europe, but has served as rationale for propagating its usage throughout the rest of the world
Longitudinal studies in the US found that language minority children educated in their home language for a majority of their elementary school years demonstrated stronger gains in English proficiency than those educated only in English or for just a short time in their first language
The Ife project in Nigeria from 1970-1978 showed students who learned in their first language for six years demonstrated higher overall academic achievement gains than students who only learned in their first language for three years
Showed that students who learned in their first language for six years demonstrated higher overall academic achievement gains than students who only learned in their first language for three years
The first group showed no difference in English proficiency from the second group despite having had fewer years with English as the medium of instruction
Consistent advantages were noted for the children in the mother tongue schools, they scored significantly higher than students in the control schools in math, reading, Filipino, and English
Use of the mother tongue alone does not guarantee positive results, consideration must be given to the way in which the policy is implemented, both from a national and local standpoint
Affected by a group's consensus about which language variety is appropriate for which speaker to use when addressing which listeners for which purposes
Language ideologies are highly contextualized and dependent upon many factors, they are formed through historical and socio-cultural circumstances and influenced by the experience of a particular social position
Schools commonly reflect the ideological values of those at the national level because of the expectation that they will carry on the established ideals
Ideologies are not simply imposed upon individuals by the 'official' culture of the ruling class but are represented by a diverse set of implicit or explicit beliefs held by members of the community
A change in beliefs requires an observation or experience that challenges the existing idea, since ideologies are beliefs that are rooted in historical, political, and socio-cultural contexts, this change is a long and complex process
Linguistic unification was a widespread perspective held by linguists in the 1960s during a time in which modernization was valued as an international development approach
Ideologies among non-dominant language speakers often favor dominant languages in education, this is partly due to hundreds of years of colonial thinking that devalues indigenous languages