different participants are used in each condition of the independent variable
strengths of independent group design
avoids order effects as people participate in one condition only
limitations in independent group design
no control over participant variables - different abilities of the participants in the various condiotions can cause changes to the DV
improvement in independent group design
random allocation reduces the lack of control over participant variables as it ensures that each participant has the same chance of being in one condition of the IV as another
repeated measures design
the same participants participate in each independent variable condition
strengths of repeated measures design
individual differences are resources
fewer people needed as they participate in all conditions - not as time consuming
limitations of repeated measures design
order effects - performance can be worse due to fatigue (fatigue effect) or it may be better because they know what to do (practise effects)
improvement in repeated measures design
counterbalancing - half of the participants do conditions in one order and the other half do it in the opposite order
matched pairs
pairs of participants are matched on some variable that has been found to affect the DV
one member of each pair is then placed into the experimental group and the other into the control group
strengths of matched pairs
no order effects
reduces participant variables as they are paired up with someone who shares similar characteristics
limitations of matched pairs
time consuming to match up pairs
impossible to match people exactly, unless they're twins