A statement that does not specify the kind of difference between the IV and DV (shows the link between variables but does not explain it and won't predict in which direction it goes)
Dependent variable
Variable that is measured
Independent variable
Variable that is changed/manipulated
Cause and effect
IV causes an effect on the DV
Levels of IVs
Different ways an experimenter can change or manipulate the IV (the amount of conditions there are)
Operationalisation of variables
How a variable can be measured or observed, through operationalisation you can systematically collect data on variables that aren't directly observable
Examples of operationalisation
Ability to cook-rate dishes from 1 to 10
Skills of a footballer-see who can do the most skills
Level of fitness-the amount of time the participants can last doing exercises
The effect of age on susceptibility to false memories-(age=IV) create categories for each age group (false memories=DV) counting the number of details remembered about a false memory
Standardisation of a procedure
Controlled variables must stay the same so that the research can be replicated so participants should all be given the same information and instructions
Participant variables
Individual differences between participants which can affect the results of a study
Situational variables
Any aspect of the environment that could impact the participants' behaviour and therefore the results
Uncontrolled variables
Factors that aren't measured or controlled by the researcher which can affect the DV (e.g. temperature of the room or noise levels)
Extraneous variables
Any variable that is not the IV which can effect the DV
Order effects (EV)
When the order of the conditions affects the result of an experiment, they occur in a repeated measures design, there are two kinds: practice & fatigue effects
Order effects-counterbalancing
Switching up the order in which the participant groups perform tasks
Order effects-randomisation/random allocation
Randomly assigning/allocating participants to different conditions which helps to remove researcher bias along with participant variables
Ways to control EVs
Single-blind testing - info withheld from participants
Double-blind testing - info withheld from participants & researchers
Deception - misleading or lying to participants about the aims of the study
Demand characteristics
Features of the experimental situation which give away the aims of the experiment, they can cause participants to change their behaviour
Social desirability
Participants changing their behaviour to be more socially desirable (be more liked)
Experimental designs (3 types)
Independent measures
Repeated measures
Matched pairs
Independent measures design
Participants take part in only 1 level of the design
Independent measures design
Demand characteristics are unlikely to effect the study
No order effects
Participant variables are likely to be present
More participants needed
Repeated measures design
All participants take part in all levels
Repeated measures design
Less participant variables
Fewer participants needed
Order effects may distort the results
Greater exposure to demand characteristics
Matched pairs design
Participants are arranged into pairs and perform different levels of IV
Matched pairs design
Demand characteristics are less likely to effect the study
Participant variables are less likely
Sample size may be small
Matching criteria has to be chosen in advance
Ecological validity
Refers to the extent to which findings from a study can be generalised to other situations and settings
Internal validity
Refers to the extent to which the researcher is testing what they claim to be testing (it looks at how strong the relationship is between the cause and effect)
Reliability
Consistency and stability of a measurement in a study
Generalisability
The extent to which you can apply the findings from a study to the wider population
Types of experiment (4 types)
Field
Quasi
Laboratory
Natural experiments
Laboratory experiment
Conducted in a controlled environment, researchers manipulate/change the IVs and measure the effects on the DVs
Laboratory experimentcharacteristics
High control over variables
Easier to replicate and standardise procedures
The artificial setting may lack ecological validity
Demand characteristics may influence participant behaviour
Field experiment
Conducted in real-world settings, researchers manipulate IVs and measure the effects on the DVs
Field experiment
Participants' behaviour is likely to be more natural
Demand characteristics are less likely to affect the study
Less control over EVs
Harder to replicate as real-world settings vary
Quasi experiment
Experiment without random assignment of participants to conditions, researchers take advantage of pre-existing groups or conditions, researchers manipulate IVs and measure the effects on the DVs
Quasi experiment
Can be used when random assignment is unavailable or is unethical
Allows researchers to study naturally occurring groups or conditions
Potential confounding variables may influence results
Lack of random assignment limits causal conditions