Nerve-to-nerve transmission can be much more sophisticated than the simple input-output relationship that occurs at the skeletal muscle Neuro-Muscular Junction
Post-synaptic response to the transmitter is slower because of the intervening step of having to activate the G protein that then has to influence the post-synaptic ion channels
Post-synaptic response to transmitter is slower still because of intervening steps of activating the G protein which then has to activate enzymes to produce 2nd messengers that then influence the post-synaptic ion channels
Net post-synaptic hyperpolarization depends on the net amount of Cl- entering the cell or K+ leaving through their respective transmitter-gated channels
Produce slower, longer-lasting responses that, in addition to voltage changes, can also involve other changes in the cell through effects at the nucleus
A pre-synaptic AP will result in the fusion of many vesicles of transmitter with the pre-synaptic membrane, resulting in the release of large numbers of transmitter
The figure above shows the change produced in the limiting case by a single vesicle of transmitter. In fact, a pre-synaptic AP will result in the fusion of many vesicles of transmitter with the pre-synaptic membrane, resulting in the release of large numbers of transmitter.
The post-synaptic effects will simply be scaled for size, in proportion to the amount of transmitter released, since more transmitter means binding to more receptors to produce a larger post-synaptic response.
EPSPs bring the membrane potential closer to the threshold for an Action Potential, increasing the likelihood of the post-synaptic cell producing an Action Potential
IPSPs take the membrane potential further from the threshold for an Action Potential, decreasing the likelihood of the post-synaptic cell producing an Action Potential