A further rejection of Chomsky's ideas on universal grammar comes from researchers working in cognitive linguistics
For example, Michael Tomasello (2003) outlines a usage-based model or language acquisition and development, arguing against language being a special 'instinct'
Instead, the ability to learn language is both primarily social (driven by the human pre-disposition to be cooperative and collaborative)
It relies on using the same kinds of cognitive processes as other forms of learning, to example, walking, drawing etc.
Tomasello identified that by the age of 9-12 months children make use of a pattern-forming ability (which is not limited to language and used by a child in a range of other learning contexts)
It enables them to learn about the different forms and functions of single words, and to understand the intentional aspect of language (I.e. that language is a way of conveying meaning)
From that, children build generalisations about now those words form large syntactic constructions or schemas, which become the building blocks for using various grammatical patterns
Rather than being the result of some kind of built-in grammar that supports the learning of language with little input, a usage-based linguistic advocates a 'bottom-up approach with the child actively building, and then using, templates for grammatical structures based on sensory input and interaction with caregivers