As wages rise, the opportunity cost of choosing leisure over work increases, so individual workers are more likely to substitute work for leisure and increase the number of hours they work
At higher levels of income, the negative income effect balances out the positive substitution effect of a wage rise so it has no effect on working hours
The backward-bending individual labour supply curve
1. At a low wage of W1 an individual would be willing to supply L1 hours of labour
2. As the wage rate increases to W2 the positive substitution effect means the individual will substitute work for leisure and supply more hours L2
3. As the wage increases to W3 the negative income effect becomes stronger - work is arguably an inferior good. The higher an individual's income (wages) get the less they will want to work as they are not prepared to sacrifice leisure time (the consumption of normal goods). At the higher wage of W3 the individual is now willing to supply less hours at L3
Some firms / occupations provide benefits that are not fully reflected in wages, known as fringe benefits, such as subsidised meals, leisure facilities, social events, company cars, pension schemes, job security, and in-work training
Benefits offered by firms that are not fully reflected in wages, e.g. subsidised meals, leisure facilities, social events, company cars, pension schemes, job security, in-work training