= a detailed account of a person's life & psychological problems
How are case studies helpful?
• Detailed, interpretative description of a person's life and psychological problems
• Source of new ideas about behavior
• Tentative support for a theory
• Challenge of a theory’s assumptions
• Introduction of new therapeutic techniques
• Opportunities to study unusual problems
What are the limitations of case studies?
• Biased observers -> bc therapists want to see their own treatment succeed
• Subjective evidence (low internal validity)
• Little basis for generalization (low external validity)
internal validity
= accuracy with which a study can pinpoint one factor as the cause of a phenomenon
-> investigators are able to rule out all possible causes except one
external validity
= degree to which the results of a study may be generalized beyond that study
correlation
= The degree to which events or characteristics vary with each other
positive correlation: going up /
negative correlation: going down \
unrelated
correlational method
= research procedure used to determmine the co-relationship between variables
subjects/ participants
= ppl chosen for a study
note: sample must be representative of the larger population
negative correlation
= value of one variable increases & value of other variable decreases
positive correlation
= variables change the same way
unrelated variables
= no consistent relationship between variables
When can correlations be trusted?
can be trusted based on a statistical analysis of probability
-> ask how likely it is that study's findings have occured by chance; if chance is unlikely -> findings reflect real correlation in population
confidence increases with sample size & magnitude of correlation
statistical significance
= the finding is unlikely to have occured by chance
Relative strengths & weaknesses of research methods
:
advantages of correlational method
high external validity (can generalize findings)
can repeat/ replicate studies with other samples
difficulties with correlational studies
lack internal validity
describe but don't explain a relationship or causation
epidemological study
= A study that measures the incidence and prevalence of a disorder in a given population
incidence
= number of new cases that emerge during a given period of time
prevalence
= the total number of cases of a disorder occurring in a population over a specific period of time
longitudinal study
= A study that observes the same participants on many occasions over a long period of time
experiment
= variable is manipulated & the manipulation's effect on another variable is observed
manipulated variable
= independent variable
variable being observed
= dependent variable
confound
= variables other than the independent variable that may also be affecting the dependent variable
control group
= in experiment, group of participants who are not exposed to the independent variable, but whose experience is similar to that of the experimental group
experimental group
= in an experiment, the participants who are exposed to the independent variable under investigation
statistical significance
-> indicates whether a participant's improvement in functioning occured because of treatment
clinical significance
-> indicates whether the amount of improvement is meaningful in the individual's life
3 features to guard against confounds:
• Control group
• Random assignment
• Masked (blind) design
random assignment
= any selection procedure that ensures that every participant in the experiment is as likely to be placed in one group as another
Masked/ blind design
= Experiment in which participants do not know which assigned group they are in
placebo therapy
= A pretend treatment that the participant in an experiment believes to be genuine