4. Evolutionary explanations of human aggression

    Cards (15)

    • Evolution - AO1

      - First theorised by Charles Darwin - 'the origin of species'
      - the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
    • Cuckoldry - AO1

      - having to raise an offspring that is not their own
      - Men face the threat of cuckoldry
      - Wate of their resources because it contributes to the survival of a rival genes
      - Leaves the father with fewer recourses to invest in future offspring
    • Men in the past who were able to avoid cuckoldry were more successful reproduce - AO1
      - Psychological mechanisms have evolved to increase anti-cuckoldry behaviours
      e.g. Sexual jealousy
      - These mechanisms drive the aggressive mate retention strategies men use to keep their partners and prevent them from staying
      - There were adaptive in our evolutionary history
    • Two major mate retention strategies
      - Identifies by Wilson and Daly (1996)
      - Direct guarding - a man vigilance over a partner's behaviour - checking what they are seeing or looking at their phone
      - Negative inducements - e.g threats of consequences for infidelity like suicide
    • Wilson et al (1995) - Findings
      - Mate retention strategies were in partners were twice as likely to suffer physical violence at their hands
      - 73% of these of women required medical attention
      - 53% - said they feared for their lives
      - Men who use guarding or negative reinforcements were more likely to use physical violence against partners.
    • Shackelford et al (2005) - AO1

      - sturdies inmate partner violence in heterosexual couples
    • Shackelford et al (2005) - Procedure - AO1

      - Men and women in 107 married couples completed difference questionaries
      All had been married 1 year or less
      - Men completed the Mate Retentions Inventory which assessed male retention behaviours in various categories e.g. direct guarding
      - Women completed the Spouse Influence Report which measured the extent of their partners violence's in their relationship
    • Shackelford et al (2005) - Findings - AO1

      - Strong positive correlation between men's reports or their mate retention strategies and women's reports of partner physcial violence
      - Men who used guarding or negative inducements were more likely to use physical violence against partners
      - According to researchers these retention behaviours reliably predicted husbands use of violence against wives
    • Evolutionary explanation of bullying - AO1
      - Bullying occurs due to power imbalance
      More powerful individual uses aggression deliberately and repeatedly against weaker person
      - Bullying traditionaly viewed maladaptive behaviour - the result of poor social skills or child abuse
      - However, evolutionary ancestors may have used bullying as an adaptive strategy to increase chances of survival - promoting their own health and creating new opportunities for reproduction
    • Volk et al (2012)

      - Argues that characteristics associated with male bullying behaviour are attractive to females
      - This is because It suggests dominance, acquisition of recourses and strength in males
      Potential of warding off potential rivals
    • Female bullying - AO1
      - takes place within a relationship and is a method of controlling a partner
      - Women use bullying behaviour to secure their partners fidelity, so they continue to provide recourses for future offspring
      - Behaviour naturally selected for because or enhanced reproductive success
    • Research support for aggression and sexual jealousy - 😊

      - Research demonstrates that mate retention strategies are associated with sexual jealousy and aggression
      - Study by Shackelford et al (2005) is a dramatic example
      - Strategies such as direct guarding and negative inducements are overwhelmingly used by makes against males and females clear link between the risk of infidelity and cuckoldry and aggression
      - Supports predictions derived from evolutionary explanation concerning adaptive value of aggression
    • Evolutionally explanations account for gender differences - 😊
      - Common observation that aggression in more common in males than females especially physically aggression.
      - Evolutionary theory explains this
      - Anne Campbell (1999) argues that a female with offspring is motivated to be less aggressive because such behaviour may put child's survival at risk
      - More adaptive strategy would be to use verbal aggression as a means of retaining a partner who provides resources and to avoid life-threating situation involving physical aggression - Buss and Shackford (1997)
      - Explain why women are more likely than men to engage in non-aggressive methods in resolving disputes
      - Ability to explain gender difference is a large strength is evolutionally theory
    • Real world application - 😊
      - Evolutionary understanding of bullying can help us derive more effective anti-bullying strategies
      - Rigby (2010) - reviewed several established interventions based on the assumption that bullying is a maladaptive behaviour that can be eradicated by addressing the bully's perceived deficiencies
      - Despite this bullying is stile prevent
      - Evolutionary explanation acknowledges that bullies bully because they stand to gain advantages
      - Makes no sense for them to voluntarily give up power over others without form of compensation
      - Volk et al - argues that anti-bullying interventions need to increase the costs of bullying and rewards for prosocial behaviour
      - Encourage bullies to compete aggressively but fairly in sporting activates
      - Would give them opportunities to display strength and power and some other attractive qualities that wouldn't be present through bullying
    • Cultural differences - 🙁
      - The !Kung people of Kalahari have largely negative views on aggressive behaviour
      - From childhood aggressive behaviour is discouraged and therefore rare
      - Those who do engage in aggressive behaviours are awarded a lower status and their reputation with their community is diminished
      - In addition, the Yanomamo of Venezuela and Brazil have been described as the fierce people
      - In their culture aggression is accepted and requires in to order to fain status
    See similar decks