Internalization - changing your beliefs or behavior to fit a wider social group because you've internalized those beliefs or behavioral norms and think genuinely that they are your own
Compliance - aligning your behavior to fit the wider social group despite your own private doubts out of a desire to fit in or out of a fear of being rejected
Identification - changing your behavior to fit a set of social norms usually associated with a specific role or position within society
Informational social influence (ISI)
Conforming and changing your behavior based on information gained from or about the wider social group
Normative social influence (NSI)
Conforming or changing your behavior based on apparent and obvious social norms and expected behavior from the wider social group
Sheriff's 1935 study looked into conformity and informational social influence
Sheriff's study procedure
1. Participants tested individually first
2. Participants tested in groups
3. Participants tested individually again
Participants converged towards the mean when tested in groups, showing informational social influence
Sheriff's study had good control of variables but limited ecological validity and ethical issues
Asch's 1951 study looked into normative social influence
Asch's study procedure
1. Participants placed in groups of 8 with 7 confederates
2. Confederates gave deliberately wrong answers
3. Real participants gave wrong answers 32% of the time
Asch's study also had good control of variables but limited ecological validity and ethical issues
Situational factors influencing conformity
Group size
Social support
Task difficulty
Dispositional factors influencing conformity
Gender
Experience and expertise
Social role
A position within society that carries a given set of expected behaviors and social norms
The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) investigated conformity to social roles
The SPE had severe ethical issues and was never precisely replicated
Orlando's 1973 study also investigated conformity to social roles in a mock psychiatric ward
Milgram's 1963 obedience experiments investigated why people obey authority figures
Milgram's study procedure
1. Participants instructed to deliver electric shocks to a learner
2. Learner was actually a confederate
3. All participants delivered shocks up to at least 300 volts
Milgram's study had massive ethical issues and limited ecological validity
Agentic state
When someone feels they are acting on behalf of a higher responsibility which has issued the orders and will take responsibility for the actions
Factors keeping someone in an agentic state
Reluctance to disrupt the experiment
Pressure of a grand and trusted surrounding
Pressure from the authority figure
Authoritarian personality
Some people have an authoritarian personality where they will obey the orders of their superiors and issue orders to their inferiors
Factors making someone resistant to social influence
Social support
Internal locus of control
Moscovici's 1969 study showed how a minority can influence a majority
Factors increasing minority influence
Consistency
Flexibility
Social impact theory outlined factors changing the extent of minority influence
Conversion theory
Members of the majority are converted to the minority view
Factors that change how likely a minority is to influence a majority
Consistency - when a minority is consistent and unchanging it becomes more likely that members of the majority will be swayed or persuaded
Flexibility - when a minority is flexible and willing to compromise or alter their approach it becomes much more likely that they will change the mind of at least some of the majority
Social impact theory
Strength - a stronger more vocal and more powerful minority is much more likely to influence the majority
Numbers - a numerically larger minority is much more influential than a numerically smaller minority
Immediacy - if a minority is close to a majority in terms of physical distance or personal relationships the influence of that minority increases
When people in a group agree with the minority
The minority starts to exert influence
As more members of the majority start to agree with the minority
The minority becomes the majority and the old majority becomes the new minority
Examples of minorities becoming the majority
Civil rights in the U.S. - the idea of racial equality was a minority view until about the 1960s
Rights of LGBT people in the UK - for most people before the 1970s the very idea of homosexuality was repulsive and repugnant, this was a very majority view that was gradually changed by the actions of an immediate numerate vocal minority
Sensory register
Stores the information taken in by our various senses, can only store an extremely small and limited amount of information for a very small amount of time
Short-term memory (STM)
Stores information for a short amount of time, usually acoustically, has limited capacity and duration but larger than the sensory register
Long-term memory (LTM)
Stores information for a long period of time, has an infinite capacity and duration, divided into episodic, semantic and procedural memory
Sperling experiment tested and provided evidence for the sensory register
Peterson and Peterson experiment tested short-term memory duration and capacity
Barrick et al. experiment tested long-term memory by asking participants to recall and match photographs of ex-classmates
Jacob's experiment
Investigated the ability of participants to recall strings of numbers and letters, found the average capacity of short-term memory was between 5 and 9 individual digits or letters
Miller's magic number
Short-term memory capacity of 7 units of information plus or minus 2