Outline two advantages of using lab experiments to investigate memory
1. Lab experiments are easy to replicate which means they can be repeated in exactly the same way and the reliability of findings can be assessed.
2. Lab experiments allow researchers to control extraneous variables (such as the environment and time given to learn the numbers, letters or words) so we can conclude causal relationships between the independent and dependent variables.
Explain why some people might criticise the use of lab experiments to investigate memory
Lab experiments may lack ecological validity as the environment of the study is often unfamiliar to participants. This can mean their responses in a lab experiment may not be representative of the participants' memory in everyday life. Furthermore, the way memory is assessed (giving participants lists to remember) is different to memory in real life as we usually have some motivation or reason to learn information in everyday life.
The sensory registers are believed to have a very large capacity but this is difficult to test because information decays rapidly unless attention is paid to it.
There is a wide range of experimental evidence to support the multi-store model of memory. For example,Jacobs(1887) asked participants to repeat sequences of numbers in the correct order immediately after they were read out. He found that most people could repeat sequences of between 5 and 9 numbers correctly before making a mistake (the average 'digit span was 7). This supports the multi-store memory as it shows that the capacity of short term memory (STM) is limited.Peterson and Peterson(1967) tested whether participants could repeat three letters in the correct order after various delays of between 3 and 18 seconds (during which they counted backwards to prevent rehearsal). They found that only 10% of the trigrams were correctly recalled after a delay of 18 seconds. This supports the multi-store model as it suggests that STM has a limited duration.Bahricktested whether people could match the names and faces of their high school classmates. He found that even participants who had left school 50 years earlier could match the names and faces correctly about 80% of the time. This supports the multi-store model as it suggests that the duration of long-term memory is unlimited
There is also supporting evidence for the multi-store model from findings from cases of people with amnesia. For example,Henry Molaison(HM) had his hippocampus removed during surgery to treat epilepsy. Afterwards, he was unable to form new long term memories of events in his life despite his short term memory functioning normally. Similarly,Clive Wearingbecame unable to form long term memories of events in his life after a virus damaged his hippocampus, despite having a normal short-term memory. These findings support the main idea of the multi-store model that short term memory is separate from long term memory as the functioning of one store can be normal while the other store is not working normally.
Some psychologists have argued that long term memory is not a single store. For example,Tulvingargued that we have episodic memory for life events, semantic memory for facts and procedural memory for skills. Evidence from cognitive neuroscience studies suggest that using each type of memories causes activity in different parts of the brain. Case studies of patients with amnesia also show that people can lose one type of memory while the other types are normal. This suggests that the multi-store model may be too simplistic in proposing a single long term memory store.