Replicability means that procedures are systematic & well-documented so they can be repeated and outcomes are reproduced- enables testing of reliability (consistency)
With Empirical Methods, information is gained through direct observation/ experimentation (rather than by intuition or beliefs)- there must be evidence on which base any claims
Objectivity means that conclusions are based on facts, which are free from bias rather than on personal opinion or expectations- this is supported by having systematic, step-by-step controlled methods with accurate measurement & recording of data
Theory construction is the process of putting together a general set of principles that explain the facts & observations, these theories are then used to understand & predict the world around us.
Theory construction (induction)- starts with observations on which a hypothesis is set, gathers evidence, makes theory on what has been gathered, and the theory construction comes after the study has been completed (evidence has already been found)
Theory construction (deduction)- starts with constructing a theory & the looking for empirical evidence to test whether it is true, the theory construction comes before the study
Theory Construction Cycle:
Setting hypothesis- prediction, based on previous research
Testing hypothesis- empirically generated evidence to prove or refute hypotheses
Revising theory- using evidence to refine theory & make it more accurate
Falsifiability= being able to observe a concept
A concept has to be observable in order to be scientifically measured
To be scientific, we look for evidence against our theory
Karl Popper argued that hypotheses should be faslfiable and we should look for evidence to disprove a theory (Hypothetico-Deductive method)
Null hypothesis- what we start research with & is essentially opposite to the theory, eg "not all swans are white", won't be a significant result
Alternative hypothesis- is inline with the theory, eg "all swans are white", will be a significant result
Our research goal should be to find evidence to support the null hypothesis, but the hypothesis must allow for being proved wrong (being falsifiable)
A paradigm= a shared set of assumptions about the subject matter of a discipline and the methods appropriate to study, (the different approaches within psychology can be seen as different paradigms). Proposed by Thomas Kuhn (1962).
Paradigm Shift= refers to the tipping point whereby one previously dominant paradigm is overthrown by the weight of conflicting evidence in favour of a new dominant paradigm
Evaluation- is psychology really a science?
Kuhn claims it cannot be; it has no single dominant paradigm unlike other sciences- in psychology there are a number of different paradigms/ approaches to explaining behaviour.
Human behaviour cannot be measured objectively- both experimenter bias & demand characteristics compromise validity.
Evaluation- is psychology really a science?
Argued that psychology shouldn't even bother trying to be a "hard science", as it isn't beneficial to the field.
The scientific approach is reductionist, simplifying complex phenomena and theories down to basics, thus losing the overall meaning.
Science is determinist in its search for casual relationships (ie, if X determines Y). Most psychologists believe in free will, which isn't within the scope of "hard science".
Aims= a general statement of what the researcher(s) intend to find out
Hypothesis= a formal statement predicting what you expect to find in your results, ensuring the variables are measurable