If the habituation and sensitization processes have equal 'strengths', they cancel each other out and there is no observable change in reflex responsiveness/vigour
According to Dual Process Theory, habituation and sensitization act in combination to produce functional changes in behaviour as a result of experience
Neither arousing nor aversive, so habituation process is activated but sensitization process is not (or only very weakly) - organism becomes progressively less responsive (habituation)
Arousing and/or aversive, so habituation process is activated but its effects are cancelled out (or exceeded) by sensitization effects - organism's responsiveness does not decline (or increases)
Without the sensitization process, habituation is not learning - it is merely a mechanism that reduces responsiveness regardless of whether the stimulus is worth responding to
If sessions of repeated ticklings with short ISIs are repeated at intervals of a day or so, a long term effect is produced that can last weeks or months
The changes involve structural changes at the cellular level
Regardless of the changes to synaptic connectivity that take place, habituation effects in elementary reflex circuits are due to a reduction of the efficacy (strength) of some synaptic connections within the circuitry