Natural gas compressed at pressures of 2,000 to 3,000 psi (130 to 200 atm) and sometimes chilled (but not liquefied) to temperatures down to (– 40°C) for even higher reduction of its volume
Most investment have been on LNG, for understandable reasons
The use of CNG was envisioned to take market share away from LNG, which, as was explained above, is not necessarily a good approach, because CNG and LNG are suitable for different transportation scenarios
Innovative low-cost and high-efficiency designs for CNG vessels have become available in the 2000s
Identification of promising scenarios is necessary to determine project economics, and possibly guide future technological developments, particularly as new CNG vessel technologies become available
1. High-pressure gas storage and transportation system based on a coil of relatively small diameter pipe (6 to 8 inches, about 15 to 20 cm) sitting in a steel-girder carousel
2. Considering natural gas compressed at 3,000 psi and at ambient temperature, a typical CNG carrier assembled with 108 carousels can offer up to 330 MMscf (about 10 MMscm) capacity
1. High-pressure gas storage and transportation system, is based on horizontal or vertical arrays of 36-meter, long large diameter pipes (about 1 m), segregated, and manifolded into a common pressure and flow system in groups of 24, called modules
2. These modules are then arranged in holds, whose count determines the CNG carrier capacity
3. The largest model of such a vessel can offer up to 800 MMscf (about 22 MMscm) of capacity
The volume taken by an amount of gas n, is proportional to ZT/p. Consequently, if gas pressure needs to be raised to a certain value, for gas volume to be reduced to a certain amount at ambient temperature, lowering the temperature (chilling) can reduce the compression requirement for the gas to occupy the same volume
Using 3 vessels per cycle would reduce the vessel size requirement to 430 MMscf each, and the total fleet size for 3 vessels per cycle would be 5,160 MMscf
Compared to the results in Example 2-1, there is a clear reduction (by 25% of the reduced values) in the total fleet volume that would be required to service consumption at the actual (lower) capacity