Bruner and Minturn

    Cards (9)

    • why the study is important
      • Carefully controlled and counterbalanced, so it could be replicated, increasing the reliability of these findings
      • Showed the importance of human experience and context in perception, challenging the idea that perceptual rules always work the same way (as stated by Gibson)
      • Confirmed how recognition can be influenced by expectation, providing support for Gregory's explanation of how we interpret information
    • Participants
      • Not very many
      • All volunteers, so their behaviour might not have been representative as they were keen and enthusiastic participants
      • Might have guessed the purpose of the study, which could have affected the results
    • Study
      • High internal validity as Bruner and Minturn controlled possible extraneous variables
      • Standardised procedures making the study replicable
    • Sample
      • Volunteer students, so the findings may not be generalisable to the wider population
      • Perception changes as a person ages or that people who volunteer have other differences that influence their perception
    • Task
      • Lacks mundane realism, as the task isn't how perception is experienced in real life as there are very few truly ambiguous situations
    • Aim
      To investigate if expectation of a stimulus influences a persons perceptual set
    • method
      Participants (student volunteers) were told they were taking part in a study on recognising numbers and letters. Numbers or letters were flashed on a screen quickly and participants had to write down what they had seen.
      There was a test stimulus a "broken B" that could be interpreted as a B or a 13.
      Participants were either flashed a series of letters or numbers before the "broken B"
    • Results
      When participants were primed with a sequence of numbers they were much more likely to write 13, when they were primed with a sequence of letters they were much more likely to write B.
    • Conclusions
      The participants expectation surrounding the stimulus figure altered how they interpreted it, their perceptual set had been influenced.
    See similar decks