Determinism is the belief that behaviour is determined by forces other than the individuals will to do something.
Behaviour is caused by something other than free will. Something that is out of our control
E.g. Biological approach suggests that behaviour is determined by physiological processes
The opposite of determinism is free will. Free will suggests that individuals can choose their behaviour and it is in their control
Behaviourist
Behaviour determined by reinforcement history (the consequences of our behaviour in the past) – e.g. if we were rewarded for completing homework, this determines future behaviour of doing homework
Social Learning
Behaviour determined by observation of others. However, could be argued that although we may learn how to behave by observing others, how and when we use this behaviour is up to us (free will)
Cognitive
Free will: We choose our own thought processes; Determinism: However, thought processes are determined by our schema (what we know/our experiences)
Biological
Determinist: physiological factors (e.g. neural/hormonal), genetic factors cause behaviour
Psychodynamic
Determinist: Unconscious factors out of our conscious control determine behaviour
Humanism
Free will: Human beings have free will and can determine their own development.
Nature vs nurture
Human behaviour is either the product of a person’s genes and biology (nature) or what they experience and their environment (nurture)
It is rare that behaviour is entirely one or the other alone
Usually nature and nurture interact
Nature vs nurture
Behaviourist
Nurture: People are ‘blank slates’ at birth. All behaviour is the result of learned associations
Social learning
Nurture: People learn as a result of observing and imitating others
Cognitive
Nature: thought processes may be the product of innate factors (e.g. we are all born with ability of cognitive processing)
Nurture: our schema is the product of our experiences (e.g. developing a negative schema because of bad experiences)
Nature vs nurture
Biological
Nature: Biological systems (e.g. CNS)/genetics determine behaviour.
Nurture: Experiences may change these biological systems
Psychodynamic
Nature: Focus on the role of unconscious forces on behaviour (e.g. the ‘id’ is biological/animalistic drives)
Nurture: How we cope with unconscious demands may be a product of our upbringing
Nature vs nurture
Humanistic
Nature: We all have an innate drive to achieve their full potential (self-actualise)
Nurture: There are problems that we face when we try to self-actualise. These are the result of our experiences (e.g. experience of conditional positive regard in childhood)
Reductionism
The practice of analysing and describing a complex phenomenon (e.g. human behaviour) in terms of its most simple and important parts
The opposite of this is holism - the idea that phenomena are best understood by looking at the interplay between many different factors
Behaviourism
Reductionist: breaks complex behaviours into stimulus-response units for ease of testing in the lab.
Biological approach
Reductionist: Explains human behaviour and psychological states simply through genes and neurons
Psychodynamic approach
Reductionist: Much of behaviour is reduced to biological instincts and sexual drives.
Holistic: Personality is a dynamic interaction between id, ego and superego
Cognitive approach
Reductionist (machine reductionism): presents people as information processing systems and ignores influence of emotion on behaviour
Social Learning theory
Reductionist: Complex learning reduced to a handful of key processes (imitation, modelling, etc.)
Holistic: Focus on mediational processes (attention, retention, motor reproduction, motivation) takes into account the more complex cognitive processes involved in social learning
reductionism
Humanistic approach
Holistic: Investigates all aspects of the individual, including the effects of interaction with others and wider society
Real World Applications and Treatments
Biological approach
Thebiological approach has led to the development of numerous drug therapies to treat disorders such as depression, OCD, schizophrenia, etc. An example of these therapies is SSRIs.
Behaviourist approach
The behaviourist approach has led to the development of treatments for phobias. Examples of these treatments are systematic desensitisation and flooding
Real world Application and treatments
Social Learning Theory
SLT is able to explain many psychological disorders including: eating disorders and aggression. This has led to positive changes such as not showing violent aggression on TV while children are awake (aggression). It has also led to treatments for anorexia by providing sufferers with healthy role models who they can imitate to overcome their anorexia or prevent it
Real world application and treatments
Cognitive Approach
The cognitive approach has led to the development of numerous treatments, including cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Furthermore, the cognitive approach has helped improve the accuracy and reliability of EWT through development of the cognitive interview.
real world application and treatments
Psychodynamic approach
This approach claims that anxiety disorders emerge from unconscious conflicts. Therefore, it has led to the development of psychoanalysis as a treatment for mental disorders. Psychoanalysis aims to put people in touch with their unconscious thoughts in order to address any underlying unconscious conflicts.
Real world application and treatments
Humanistic approach
This approach has influenced counselling. The humanistic approach claims that an individual’s psychological problems are a direct result of their conditions of worth (whether parents gave them unconditional love or conditional love). Therefore, the humanistic approach suggests that counsellors need to give patients unconditional positive regard (empathy, understanding and acceptance) in order to treat their psychological problems.