Walster and her colleagues what matters most with equity is that both partners' level of profit is roughly the same
This is not the same as equality where costs and rewards have to be the same (i.e., 'equal') for each partner
Lack of equity, then one partner overbenefits and the other underbenefits from the relationship, and this is a recipe for dissatisfaction
Both are examples of inequity although it is the underbenefitted partner who is likely to feel the greatest dissatisfaction in the form of anger
Overbenefitted partner will likely feel guilt
Equity and equality
Not the amount of the rewards and costs that matters it's the ratio of the two
If 1 partner puts a lotinto the relationship but at the same time gets a lotout of it they're likely to feel satisfied
IE One partner works night shifts therefore cannot cook tea
Equal distribution of domestic tasks would not be seen as fair by either partner equity may come from the compensations that night-shift partner could offer in other areas
Satisfying relationships marked by negotiations to ensure equity that rewards are distributed fairly between them involves making trade-offs
Consequences of inequity
Problems arise when one partner puts a greatdeal into the relationship but gets little out of it.
A partner who perceives inequity will become distressed and dissatisfied with the relationship if this state of affairs continues for long enough. The greater the perceived inequity, the greater the dissatisfaction - equity theory predicts a strongcorrelation between the two. This applies to both the overbenefitted and underbenefitted partner to the extent that they both perceive the inequity.
Consequences:
Changes in perceived equity:
What makes us most dissatisfied is a change in the level of perceived equity as time goes on
For example, at the start of a relationship it may feel perfectly natural to contributemore than you receive. But if the relationship develops in such a way that you continue to put more into the relationship and get less out of it, this will not feel as satisfying as it did in the early days.
Consequences:
Dealing with inequity:
The underbenefitted partner is usually motivated to make the relationship more equitable as long as they believe it is possible to do so and that the relationship is salvageable
The more unfair the relationship feels the harder they will work to restore equity
Another possible outcome is a cognitive
They will revise their perceptions of rewards and costs so that the relationship feels more equitable to them even if nothing actually changes
What was once seen as definitely a cost earlier in the relationship (actual abuse) is now accepted as the norm