Participant observation

    Cards (15)

    • What is participant observation?
      This is when a researcher joins the group , they’re observing this can be overt ( subjects know they’re being observed ) or covert ( subject dont know theyre being observed )
    • what is non-participant observation?
      this is observing without directly joining the group
    • What is overt observation? 

      This is when the group being studied know they’re being observed
    • what are the strength of overt observation?
      able to take notes / ask questions
      more in depth than observing from a distance
      its got validity
      more ethical - can get consent and no deception \
      interpretivits prefer
      could be useful when researching schools
    • what are the limitation to overt observations?
      answers may lack details
      interviewer bias
      right answerism
      cannot clarify
      not as much validity
      small sample - less representative
      practical issues - time consuming
    • What is covert observation? 

      This is when subjects do not know theyre being observed
    • what are the strength of covert observation?
      no Hawthorne effect
      validity
      representative
      can be applied to real life
      interpretivits prefer
    • what are the limitation of covert observation?
      ethical issues - deception, informed consent
      practical issues - time consuming
      theoretical issues - small scale of lacking representativeness
    • what were the key aspects of PO in Venkatesh’s study? 

      joined the gang despite being a m/c graduate
      he went and gained insight and knowledge
      he was researching on the outside then went on to actually get in inside
    • what is the PET analysis on venkatesh’s study? 

      Practical issues: time consuming - actually taking th time to join the gang and have those research opportunities take time
      Ethical issues: danger and harm - he was exposed to the gangs criminal activities
      no confidentiality for researcher participants when crime occurs ( perhaps guilty knowledge? )
      consent: the participants gave informed consent
      theoretical issues: ones have validity as it was a covert participant observation
      however, unreliable
    • What were the key aspects of PO in Willis learning to labour study? 

      12 non academic students
      anti - school SC
      w/c boys
      used Observations and PO in classroom
      he used other varied methods
      followed into the workplace ( PO )
      interviewed with them and people around them
      the lads trusted Willis as he didn’t snitch on their illegal activities
    • what is the PET analysis on Willis study? 

      practical issues: time consuming
      ethical issues: guilty knowledge- since Willis knew of their illegal activities but didn't snitch
      theoretical issues: small scale - unrepresentative
      decrease in reliability
      bias view - withholding information
    • PET issues with using PO as a research method

      • Practical issues:
      • Time consuming
      • Gatekeepers, there are more of them, you need to be allowed entry into the group you're observing
      • Acceptance and building a rapport report
    • PET issues with using PO as a research method

      • Ethical issues:
      • Issues with informed consent, as no body knows exactly how the research will un-fold in PO
      • Reporting rule breaking criminality is something to consider (guiltily knowledge)
    • PET issues with using PO as a research method
      • Theoretical issues:
      • Hawthorne effect - may impact behaviour to differing degrees depending on how good the relationships is between researcher and participants
      • Positivists would criticise this as its not conductive to obtaining quantitative data
    See similar decks