increases in motivation causes increased drive, more drive = more chance of increased performance. as arousal increases so does performance. performance = function (drive x habit). However it states performance still increases when over aroused which contradicts inverted u theory.
less info can be processed with high arousal, performer resorts to well learned skills. cognitive may select the wrong option as they haven't learnt correct response however even high level performers "choke" (penalty, false start). if skill = complex = more decisions, high levels of arousal lead to less info that can be processed - might cause mistakes.
there is an optimal arousal level at which people perform best at. gross skills, autonomous performers, extroverts (higher arousal). fine, cognitive, introverts (lower arousal)
Need to consider, nature of the task, skill level and personality
Theory suggesting that increased arousal improves performance to an optimal point but there is a sudden dramatic reduction in performance when arousal increases beyond the optimal if performer fails to control arousal. performance can return to optimum if initial anxiety is mild and the performer has time to recover.
the unique area of arousal which allows performer to have maximum concentration and effort. once in correct zone - performance set to improve as: performance flows more effortlessly, reaches supreme confidence, athletes feel in total control. zone links to personality and skill type.
The ultimate intrinsic experience felt by athletes from a positive mental attitude, with supreme confidence, focus and efficiency. effected by: poor mental prep, environmental influences (crowds), effects of injury and fatigue. development of flow promoted by intrinsic motives. performer has control over all aspects.