What was Baddeley's (1966) research and what did he conclude?
Procedure: He read 4 different groups 4 different sets of words (acoustically similar/dissimilar and semantically similar/dissimilar) He asked them to recall the words immediately and acoustically similar words had the worst recall rate. (a.d. best) He also asked them to recall the words after 20 minutes and this time semantically similar words were the worst. (s.d. best)
Conclusion: He concluded that we store information acoustically in out STM but semantically in our LTM
Procedure: The researcher read out four digits and the participants have to recall these in the corrects order with the amount of digits increasing with each time they do it correctly. Their digit span is the max number of digits recalled correctly before fumbling.
The mean digit span was 9.3 for numbers and 7.3 for letters.
Conclusion: This research helped in determining STM capacity
What are some evaluation points to studies about capacity?
Strength- Jacob's (1887) has temporal and concurrent validity as although it is an old study (limited control back then) it has been replicated many times to the same result
Limitation- Miller's (1956) research may have been an overestimate of STM capacity as Cowan (2001) reviewed other research and concluded that the capacity is more likely 4 (± 1)
What was Peterson & Peterson's (1959) research and their conclusion?
Procedure: 24 students were given a consonant syllable (e.g. YCG) to recall and a 3 digit number to count backwards from (to stop mental rehearsal) for a different length of time for each time. After 3 seconds, the average recall was about 80% and after 18 seconds about 3%.
Conclusion: They concluded that the STM has a duration of about 18 seconds without rehearsal
What was Bahrick et al.'s (1975) research and his conclusion?
Procedure: 392 American participants aged between 17 and 74 were studied. They were first asked to (1) do a photo recognition test of 50 photos (some from their yearbook) and (2) a free recall test were they had to recall the names of their graduation class.
Recognition test- 90% accurate within 15 years of graduation, 70% after 48 years Free recall- 60% recall after 15 years, 30% after 48 years
Conclusion: This shows that LTM may have a duration of up to a lifetime for some material.
What was Baddeley et al.'s experiment supporting the WMM?
Procedure: His participants carried out a visual and verbal task at the same time (dual task) and their performance was roughly similar to when they carried them out separately. However when he gave them two visual (or verbal) tasks, performance declined substantially
Conclusion: This supported the WMM theory as it proves there are separate subsystems
- [S] HM & CW couldn't recall what happened at the past, but semantic memories were a unaffected (HM didn't need to have 'dog' explained to him) & procedural memories were still intact (could still play the piono)
- [C] it's unethical and not really relevant to the rest of the world to study people with severe brain damage (consent?)
lack of control. Rs didn't know what their memory was like before the damage, therefore clinical studies are limited on what they can ted us about general diff types of LTM
- [O] the MSM does not recognise the diff. stores of long-term memory; baddeley found that people mix of semantically similar word, meaning that all words get encoded in the long-term memory semantically
- [A] Belleville et al (2006) devised, an interim intervention for older people, targeting episodic memory,(what is affected by old age), which improved their memory, which led to distinguishing between types of long-term memory, enables specific treatments to be developed
- [R] memory does not work the same way for everyone; Tulving's Siri is very holistic and ignores people's differences
Someone who has a rare neurological condition that caused irreparable damage to his hippocampus meaning he has antergrade amnesia and retrograde amnesia. He constantly feels like he has just awoken from a coma as his consciousness is 'rebooted' every 7-30 seconds.
He was a successful musician and though he can't remember that, he still remembers the procedural skill of how to play his piano perfectly.