In Griffiths' study, 2 , one gamble one no gamblers groups had very different thought processes,eg. gamblers had more irrational verbalisations
Information from Griffiths' study is useful as it can help tackle addiction
Nisbett and Wilson found that introspection is not always accurate
We are not aware of underlying processes that influence our behaviour
It is impossible for everything to be revealed through introspection
they found it specifically a problem to do with stereotypes eg.someon can be implicitly racist and this will change how they act towards ethnic group whilst they are completley unware of it and in would not be revealed
eg.energy conservation study
Scientific method
The study "Strange Situation" follows the scientific method
The study "Strange Situation" has a standardised procedure which is systematic and replicable
Allows studies to be applied universally
Crucial in understanding human behaviour on a larger scale
The "Strange Situation" study has populational validity and has been able to be replicated in 8 countries
-cultural differences may mean it isn't accurate for every culture
For a study to be completely systematic and replicable, it may lack ecological validity
To eliminate extraneous variables, studies tend to be in a lab or more contrived environment
Results may be accurate to a controlled environment but may not be replicable in real-life experiments
Real-life vs lab study example
Christianson and Hubinette found in real life anxiety increases accuracy
Johnson and Scott found anxiety to reduce accuracy in lab studies