The only source of knowledge comes through our senses (not inherited) and is gained through experience
Objective
All sources of bias are minimized and personal or subjective ideas are eliminated
Control
All extraneousvariables need to be controlled in order to be able to establish cause and effect
Predictability/determinism
We should be aiming to be able to predict future behaviour from the findings of our research
Features of science
Empirical methods
Objectivity
Replicability
Hypothesis testing/ theory
Scientific research methods
Lab experiment, field experiment, observation, natural experiment and quasi-experiment
Non-scientific research methods
Casestudy, questionnaire, interviews, content analysis and correlations
Aim
general statement of the purpose of an investigation
Hypothesis
testable statement about the expectedoutcome of the investigation
Operationalisation
Making the variables testable
importance of operationalisation
a hypothesis can only be tested if the variables being studied can be measured
Independent variable
the variable the researcherchanges in order to test its effect on the DV
Dependent variable
the variable measured by the experimenter
Null hypothesis
A statement which predicts no difference or relationship in the results
Experimental/alternative hypothesis
A statement that predicts a difference or a relationship in results
Directional hypothesis (one-tailed)
Specifies the direction of results/correlation
Non-directional hypothesis
Does not state the direction of results and is used when there is nopreviousresearch or previous research has found contradictoryresults
Repeated measures design
same pps. used in bothconditions of IV
Strength of repeated measures design
No participant variablesas individual differences are eliminated and less pps. needed
Weakness of repeated measures design (d.c.)
demand characteristics due to pps. take part in all conditions
Weakness of repeated measures design (o.e.)
order effectse.g. boredom may occur (control using counterbalancing)
Independent groups design
Participantsrandomly allocated to 2 differentgroups
Strength of independent groups design
Lower chance of demand characteristics, no order effects due to only doing one condition
Weakness of independent groups design
Participant variables confound results cos there's different participants in different conditions, more pps. are required
Matched pairs design
pairs of pps. closely matched and randomly allocated to one condition/other
Strength of matched pairs
avoids order effects and demand characteristics, reduced individual differences, same material can be used in both conditions
Weakness of matched pairs
Can't fully match participants, time consuming and requires more pps.
Extraneous variable
a variable other than the IV that might have an effect on the DV (e.g. weather or noise) - should be controlled so they don't become confounding
Confounding variable
extraneous variables which do affect the DV i.e. 'confound' the results e.g. participants personalities
Situational variable
Aspects of the situation that interact with aspects of the person to produce behaviour (e.g environment, noise or time of day)
Operationalism
defining the variable so it can be measured numerically and specifies how variable will be tested
Participant variable
Individual differences between the pps. in the conditions of the IV
Counterbalancing
Used to balance out impact of order effects in repeated measures design (involves making sure each condition comes first/second in equal amounts) i.e. allows for order effects to be distributed evenly across both conditions
Random allocation
Allocating pps. to experimental groups/conditions so pps. have an equal chance to take part in each condition (allows even distribution of pp. characteristics across conditions to avoid extraneous variables)
use of random allocation
addresses problem of pp.variables in an independent groups design
Standardisation
Using exactly the same formalised procedures and instructions for all participants so individual experience does not become a confoundingvariable and i.e. enable replication
use of standardisation
addresses issue of experimenterbias as standardised procedures includes standardisedinstructions that are the same for all pps. i.e. deals with investigator effects
Randomisation
Making materials/order of conditions random to avoid researcher bias influencing design of the study
use of randomisation
avoidsresearcher biasinfluencing thedesignof the study i.e.control investigator effects
pilot study
small scale trial run of a study which takes place before the study