There has been a lot of debate about whether personality is innate __ or learned from one’s experiences in childhood and beyond
nature;nurture
is a set of related assumptions that allows scientists to use logical deductive reasoning to formulate testable hypotheses
scientific theory
can never fill all the requirements of an adequate theory.
singleassumption
Unless a __ can be tested in some way, it is worthless. The possibility that scientists in the future might develop the necessary means to test it.
hypothesis
Means love of wisdom, and philosophers are people who pursue wisdom through thinking and reasoning. Philosophers are not scientists; they do not ordinarily conduct controlled studies in their pursuit of wisdom.
Philosophy
the nature of knowledge.
Epistemology
Closely tied to empirically gathered data and to science
Speculation
__is the branch of study concerned with observation and classification of data and with the verification of general laws through the testing of hypotheses. __are useful tools employed by scientists to give meaning and organization to observations
Science;Theories
An educated guess or prediction specific enough for its validity to be tested through the use of the scientific method.
Hypothesis
A classification of things according to their natural relationships. are essential to the development of a science because without classification data science could not grow.
Taxonomy
ability to stimulate and guide further research
Generates research
concerned with the measurement, labeling, and categorization of the units employed in theory building
Descriptive research
leads to an indirect verification of the usefulness of the theory that may reshape and enlarge the theory
Hypothesis testing
ability to be confirmed or disconfirmed a theory
Falsifiable
be able to organize those research data that are not incompatible with each other.
Organizes data
ability to guide the practitioner over the rough course of day-to-day problems
Guides action
is one whose components are logically compatible.
Is internally consistent
ability to generate research, be falsified, give meaning to data, guide the practitioner, and be self-consistent, the simpler one is preferred.
Parsimonious
Are people’s behaviors determined by forces over which they have no control, or can people choose to be what they wish to be? Can behavior be partially free and partially determined at the same time? Although the dimension of determinism versus free will is more philosophical than scientific, the position theorists take on this issue shapes their way of looking at people and colors their concept of humanity.
Determinism versus Free choice.
Are people doomed to live miserable, conflicted, and troubled lives, or can they change and grow into psychologically healthy, happy, fully functioning human beings? In general, personality theorists who believe in determinism tend to be pessimistic (Skinner was a notable exception), whereas those who believe in free choice are usually optimistic.
Pessimism versus Optimism.
Causality holds that behavior is a function of past experiences, whereas teleology is an explanation of behavior in terms of future goals or purposes. Do people act as they do because of what has happened to them in the past, or do they act as they do because they have certain expectations of what will happen in the future?
Causality versus Teleology.
Are people ordinarily aware of what they are doing and why they are doing it, or do unconscious forces impinge on them and drive them to act without awareness of these underlying forces?
Conscious versus Unconscious.
Are people mostly creatures of biology, or are their personalities shaped largely by their social relationships? A more specific element of this issue is heredity versus environment; that is, are personal characteristics more the result of heredity, or are they environmentally determined?
Biological versus Socialinfluences.
Is the salient feature of people their individuality, or is it their common characteristics? Should the study of personality concentrate on those traits that make people alike, or should it look at those traits that make people different?
Uniqueness versus Similarities
a measuring instrument is the extent to which it yields consistent results.
Reliability
the degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure.
Validity
the extent to which an instrument measures some hypothetical construct
Construct validity
the extent that scores on that instrument correlate highly (converge) with scores on a variety of valid measures of that same construct.
Convergent construct validity
if it has low or insignificant correlations with other inventories that do not measure that construct.
Divergent construct validity
if it discriminates between two groups of people known to be different.
Discriminant validity
the extent that a test predicts some future behavior.
Predictive validity
A classification of things according to their natural relationships.
taxonomy
are essential to the development of a science because without classification data science could not grow