Team members begin to accept each other and roles and norms are established within the team. Players feel able to communicate their personal opinions and "in-group" feelings start to develop
Key research - Smith et al (1979) - Coach effectiveness training: a cognitive-behavioural approach to enhancing relationship skills in youth sports coaches
Research evidence by Carron et al. - Positive correlation between team cohesiveness and successful performance, but correlation does not show cause and effect
Group formation, a stage theory - The sequence of stages remained the same for all groups, but the duration of each stage varies across teams. A fifth stage, adjourning, was later added to account for team termination
Teams undergo a period of interpersonal conflict, for example hostility towards team members stemming from learning new tactics or challenging each other for positions or tasks
Difference between a team and a group - Teams have a collective identity, common purpose, and depend on each other to achieve objectives. Team cohesiveness is a major variable affecting team performance
Role of a coach - Sports coaches assist athletes in developing to their full potential, training athletes in a sport, providing guidance in life and the sport, supporting them emotionally, setting performance goals, and building team cohesion
Team members meet one another and adjust themselves to the task and the context of the team. Relationships with leaders such as the coach and other team members are established. Players familiarise themselves with normal standards of the team
Importance of understanding the stages of group formation - Tuckman suggests that team processes evolve over the course of team development, and a knowledge of the stages is useful for coaches to anticipate problems and intervene to meet the specific needs of the team at specific times
Attended a 2-hour Coach Effectiveness training session focusing on increasing positive interactions & decreasing negative interactions, monitored behavior after the first 10 games, urged to increase reinforcement rate to 25%
Method: Field study with independent measures design, IV: Training program or not, DV: observed behaviors of coaches, players' perceptions, attitudes towards coach, teammates, baseball, and self-esteem
The aim of the study was to make coaches more aware of their behaviors and the consequences, increase their desire and ability to develop positive interactions between themselves and their players
Conclusion: The training program had a significant impact on coaches' behaviors towards players, affecting players' self-esteem and attitudes towards the coach and their sporting experience
Effectiveness of the training program was assessed by comparing experimental and control coaches in terms of observed behaviors and players' perceptions
Leadership emerges from a combination of multiple individual traits such as motivation and problem-solving, then situational influences change the effects that certain attributes might have on leadership
Findings: Coaches who undertook the program were more likely to use positive reinforcement and encouragement, less likely to punish children, and players showed greater improvement in self-esteem