Belief in free will doesn't deny that there may be biological or environmental factors that influence behavior; but believe we can reject it as we are in control
James thought although it's the scientist's job to determine behavior, it doesn't take away the freedom that we have to make irrational choices every day
Fraud believed free will is an illusion but influenced by biological drives and instincts; determined human behavior was due to conscious conflicts (no such thing as accident)
The scientific emphasis on causal explanations: Every event has a cause and can be explained through general laws. Lab experiments enable research to demonstrate causal relationships
Practical value: We exercise our choice every day. Roberts et al. looked at adolescents who believed in fatalism and found adolescents were at greater risk of developing depression. People who show an external rather than internal locus of control are less likely to be optimistic. Even if we do not have free will, the belief has a good impact on behavior
Brain scan evidence doesn't believe in free will but determinism: Libet et al. told participants to flick their wrist anytime while measuring brain activity. They had to say when they had the conscious will to move it. Unconscious brain activity to the conscious decision to move came about half a second before participants decided to move. Interpreted as even our free will experiences are determined by our brain
Libet's findings about the brain being involved in decision-making is what we expect: Just because action comes before conscious awareness doesn't mean there was no decision to act. Evidence is not appropriate to challenge free will
The position of the legal system on responsibility: Hard determinism isn't consistent in the legal system, as in a court of law, offenders are held responsible for their actions. Determinism doesn't work in the real world