Forensic investigation should be objective and scientific; however it is not accurate 100% of the time
Fingerprints
Patterns of ridges on the pads of fingers and thumbs, each one is unique
No two people, not even identical twins, have ever been shown to have identical fingerprints
Fingerprint analysis
Identification of suspects has been greatly assisted by digitally stored fingerprints, international and national databases of people for whom fingerprints are on file and computer programs which enable rapid searching of these databases to find a match for a print lifted from a crime scene
Forensic science instils in us a confidence that such evidence is collected and analysed both systematically and objectively and provides us with compelling evidence as to the guilt or innocence of suspects
Fingermark/latent mark
Fingers leave a trace of this pattern on surfaces we touch, often poor quality, incomplete, smudged, distorted or obscured
Inked prints
Marks can be used to determine whether they match the prints of a known suspect - taken in controlled conditions so they are high quality
Job of a crime scene analyst
Fingerprints are analysed and compared by experts, they decide whether the ridge details on the suspect's finger(s) matched those fingermarks collected from the crime scene
Two fingerprint experts are needed to complete the identification process in order to verify the judgments made and reduce likelihood of misidentifications
Inter-observer consistency
Differences between fingerprint examiners
Difference in one fingerprint examiner over time
Fingerprint comparison
An "information processing task" involving processes such as attention and visual searching
Cognitive bias
When someone is not accurate or objective about the way they think about something - in this case fingerprint analysis
Even if experts think that a serious crime has affected their analysis, this does not necessarily mean that it has actually affected their final fingerprint identification decision
er research suggests that viewing stimuli such as latent marks, cognitive processes are in part determined by unconscious effects i.e. expectations and biases which can detrimentally affect decision-making about matches between prints
Usefulness
Wider implications than just fingerprints i.e. hair, DNA. The issues of confirmation biases and emotional context and the corresponding recommendations for improved procedures, may generalise to other practices
Psychology as a science
Ways to improve analytical processes in forensics rely on some of the same strategies used to maintain objectivity in psychological experiments
Analysts
Benefit from being 'blind' to key information that could influence the way they collect and interpret their data
Another way to reduce bias is to hide the 'real' information among other irrelevant but plausible items, as is done with filler questions designed to hide the key items in questionnaires
In forensics, the (potentially) 'real' prints can be presented within the context of similar 'filler' prints
The suggestions are designed to improve the analysis and ensure it is based on scientific processes
You need to know:
Background – Collection and use of of evidence from witnesses and suspects
Key research – Memon and Higham (1999) A review of cognitive interview
Application- At least one strategy for police interviews