Identification of suspects has been greatly assisted by digitally stored fingerprints, international and national databases of people for whom fingerprints are on file and computer programs which enable rapid searching of these databases to find a match for a print lifted from a crime scene
Forensic science instils in us a confidence that such evidence is collected and analysed both systematically and objectively and provides us with compelling evidence as to the guilt or innocence of suspects
Fingerprints are analysed and compared by experts, they decide whether the ridge details on the suspect's finger(s) matched those fingermarks collected from the crime scene
Two fingerprint experts are needed to complete the identification process in order to verify the judgments made and reduce likelihood of misidentifications
Even if experts think that a serious crime has affected their analysis, this does not necessarily mean that it has actually affected their final fingerprint identification decision
er research suggests that viewing stimuli such as latent marks, cognitive processes are in part determined by unconscious effects i.e. expectations and biases which can detrimentally affect decision-making about matches between prints
Wider implications than just fingerprints i.e. hair, DNA. The issues of confirmation biases and emotional context and the corresponding recommendations for improved procedures, may generalise to other practices
Benefit from being 'blind' to key information that could influence the way they collect and interpret their data
Another way to reduce bias is to hide the 'real' information among other irrelevant but plausible items, as is done with filler questions designed to hide the key items in questionnaires
In forensics, the (potentially) 'real' prints can be presented within the context of similar 'filler' prints