Session 6 Screening

    Cards (23)

    • Disease Detection - three methods:
      • Spontaneous presentation
      • Opportunistic case finding
      • Screening
    • Systematic attempt to distinguish between apparently well persons who are considered likely to have the disease in question, from those considered not likely to - screening
    • Advantages of Screening?
      • Early detection and treatment
      • Prevention and Risk Reduction
      • Public health benefits
      • health education and awareness
      • Cost-effective
    • Disadvantages of screening?
      • False positives and negatives
      • Overdiagnosing and overtreatment
      • Ethical considerations
      • Resource allocation
      • Logistical challenges
    • NHSPopulation Screening Programmes :Screening for Adults
      1. Diabetic eye screening (from age 12 and above annually)
      2. Cervical cancer
      3. Breast cancer
      4. Bowel cancer
      5. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)
      • Breast cancer screening is offered to women aged 50 to 70 -Women aged 70 and over can self-refer.
      • Cervical screening is offered to women/people aged 25-64 - Every 3 years between the ages of 25-49 years, and - Every 5 years between the ages of 50-64 years.
      • NHS bowel cancer screening is offered to people aged 50 or over - 50 to 74, you'll automatically be invited to do a home testing kit every 2 years (FIT test) - Over 75, you can ask for a kit every 2 years by calling.
      • AAA - all men at 65 offered a single ultrasound screening scan.
    • Screening in pregnancy?
      • Infectious diseases (hepatitis B, HIV and syphilis)
      • Fetal Anomaly screening (Down's syndrome T23, Patau's syndrome T13 and Edwards' syndrome T18)
      • Sickle cell disease and thalassaemia
      • 20-week scan to check the physical development of the baby
      • Diabetic eye screening if you are pregnant and have type 1 or type 2 diabetes
    • Screening for newborn babies?
      • Physical examination, which includes the eyes, heart, hips and testes.
      • Hearing test
      • Blood spot test to check if the baby has any of 9 rare conditions (e.g Sickle cell disease, Cystic fibrosis, Congenital hypothyroidism, phenylketonuria, medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, maple syrup urine disease, isovaleric acidaemia, glutaric type 1, homocystinuria).
    • Criteria for screening programmes: Wilson & Jungner criteria
      • Disease/condition
      • Test
      • Treatment
      • Programme
      • Implementation criteria
      • Test validity represents the extent to which a test measures what it intends to measure.
      • Can be thought of as the accuracy of the test.
      • Measured by sensitivity and specificity.
      • Determined by comparing a new test with the gold standard test.
    • Sensitivity: The ability of a test to correctly identify an individual as having a disease. These are individuals who actually have the condition (e.g., a disease) and test positive for it.
    • Sensitivity= true positives / (true positives + false negatives)
    • Specificity: The ability of a test to correctly classify an individual as ‘disease-free’.
    • Specificity= true negatives / (true negatives + false positives).
    • a highly specific test can help to rule in a disease when positive.
      A highly sensitive test can help to rule out a disease when negative.
    • Positive predictive value (PPV): The proportion of test-positive individuals who actually have the disease. A measure of how accurate a positive test result is likely to be.
    • PPV =truepositives/ (true positives + false positives)
    • Negative predictive value (NPV): The proportion test-negative individuals who reallydo not have the disease. A measure of how accurate a negative test result is likely to be.
    • NPV =true negatives / (true negatives + false negatives)
    • Where earlydiagnosis falsely appears to prolong survival: lead time bias.
    • Screening programmes better at picking up slow growing, unthreatening cases than aggressive, fast growing ones : Length time bias
    • Studies of screening often skewed by ‘healthy volunteer’ effect : selection bias
    • Evaluation difficulties?
      • Lead time bias
      • Length time bias
      • Selection bias
      • Morbidity vs mortality
      • Population diversity and equal access.
    See similar decks