Approaches

Subdecks (2)

Cards (50)

  • Behaviourist view on free will vs determinism
    Environmental Determinism. Behaviour is determined by environmental stimuli, and we have no control over our response.
  • Behaviourist view on nature vs nurture
    Nurture. Humans are born as tabula rasa (blank slate) and behaviour is learned through experience.
  • Behaviourist approach
    Experimental Reductionism. Behaviour is reduced to simple mechanistic properties such as classical conditioning.
  • Behaviourist approach

    Nomothetic. It attempts to establish general universal laws through systematic associations.
  • The behaviourist approach is scientific as it utilises scientific methods like lab studies to systematically measure behaviour.
  • Social Learning Theory (SLT) view on free will vs determinism

    Soft Determinism. Behaviour is influenced by environmental factors but there is personal responsibility and some free will.
  • SLT view on nature vs nurture
    Nurture. Behaviour is learned through observation and vicarious reinforcement.
  • SLT approach
    Experimental Reductionism. It reduces behaviour to mechanistic properties like vicarious reinforcement.
  • SLT approach
    Nomothetic. It attempts to establish general universal laws through vicarious reinforcement.
  • SLT is mostly scientific, as it uses scientific methods to study behaviour.
  • Cognitive view on free will vs determinism
    Soft Determinism. Behaviour is governed by internal thought processes, but humans can choose what information they attend to.
  • Cognitive approach view on nature vs nurture
    Nature and Nurture. Behaviour is a product of internal thought processes modified through experience.
  • Cognitive approach
    Experimental Reductionism. Carefully controlled experiments isolate variables.
  • Cognitive approach
    Idiographic and Nomothetic. It uses case studies to establish general laws.
  • The cognitive approach is mostly scientific. It uses methods to observe behaviour but faces challenges in directly observing cognitive processes.
  • Biological view on free will vs determinism
    Biological Determinism. Behaviour is determined by internal biological factors.
  • Biological approach view on nature vs nurture
    Nature. Behaviour is shaped by genetic, hormonal, and neurotransmitter factors.
  • Biological approach
    Biological Reductionism. Behaviour is broken down to biological structures and processes.
  • Biological approach
    Nomothetic. It creates universal laws by extrapolating findings from animals to humans.
  • The biological approach is scientific as it uses highly objective scientific methods like brain scans.
  • Psychodynamic view on free will vs determinism
    Psychic Determinism. Behaviour is determined by unconscious drives and early childhood experiences.
  • Psychodynamic approach view on nature vs nurture
    Mainly Nature. Behaviour is controlled by innate drives, with early experiences shaping them.
  • Psychodynamic approach
    Reductionist and Holistic. It reduces behaviour to unconscious drives but also considers multiple aspects of behaviour.
  • Psychodynamic approach
    Idiographic and Nomothetic. It establishes general laws through case studies and examines unconscious drives.
  • The psychodynamic approach is not scientific as it uses subjective interpretation and is not testable with empirical methods.
  • Humanistic view on free will vs determinism

    Free Will. Humans can control their environments and change.
  • Humanistic approach view on nature vs nurture
    Nurture. Behaviour is determined by the environment, with humans striving for self-actualisation.
  • Humanistic approach

    Holistic. It considers all aspects of human experience and interaction.
  • Humanistic approach
    Idiographic. It focuses on the subjective nature of human experience without trying to establish general laws.
  • The humanistic approach is not scientific as it rejects scientific methods and empirical evidence.