KF had poor short-term memory for auditory information but could process visual information normally
KF's phonological loop was damaged but his visuo-spatial sketchpad was intact
A03: An issue with KF's case study is that it is unclear whether he had other cognitive impairments which might have affected his performance on memory tasks
A03: There is challenging evidence that comes from clinical studies of people with brain injuries that may have affected many different systems
A03: Support for the working memory model comes from Baddeley and Hitch's 1974 study where participants carried out a vision task and a verbal task at the same time, and their performance was similar to when they carried out the tasks separately
A03: There is a lack of clarity over the nature of the Central Executive component of the working memory model
Baddeley said the Central Executive is the most important component, but it was least understood
A03: The Central Executive needs to be more clearly defined than just simply being "attention"
The lack of clarity over the Central Executive component challenges the integrity of the working memory model
A03: Findings of Shallice and Warrington's study
KF had very poor short-term memory (STM) recall for auditory stimuli
KF had increased STM recall for visual stimuli
He could recall words when he read them but not when read to him.
PLL damaged, but VSS intact
A03: Findings of Shallice and Warrington's study
Suggests the components of memory which process auditory and visual stimuli are separate (as described in the WMM through the phonological loop and the visuo-spatial sketchpad)
A03: Dual-task performance studies(Baddeley)
Each participant must undertake a visual and verbal task simultaneously
And the same for same condition task
Found that performance was better when tasks were of different nature
Shows that there are different slave systems that process visual input and verbal input