Mainly held together by Watson-Crick base pairs, but non-canonical base pairs exist, such as Hogsten pairs
Watson-crick base pairs are the most stable in a double helix
Even though they're rigid, there is some exceptions to these rules that can lead to non-Watson and crick base pairing
With Hoogsteen, the anomeric conformation of the nucleotides, as the nitrogenous bases are being rotated - A-T in WC everything is anti, Hoogsteen we have a syn A and an anti T which changes the base pairing pattern
Structures are skewed from each other
In G-C we lose one of the hydrogen bonds in Hoogsteen, and the geometry is changing its elongating and being thrown out of alignment which can lead to weaker hydrogen bonding
H-bond drive base pair complementarity, but add little to the stability of nucleic acids
Stacking interactions (hydrophobic interactions) are primary stabilizing force
Hydrogen bonds aren't that strong of a force, it's the base pair stacking interactions that allows for the stability
Looking at a simple sequence, can expect one to be more stable than another
Note, nucleic acids with high GC content are more stable duplex than one with a low GC content; stability is sequence-dependent
Therefore, CCGAGCTTGG is more stable than TTACATGGAA
Further stability is achieved by counterions, namely cations
Divalent cations like Mg2+ are most effective shielding agents
General trend, the stacking between G and C gives greater energy – therefore greater stability
Pyrimidines and purines if they are stacking over one another they are not as strong as purines and purines would otherwise be