Is the company's businessmodel to hold the specific financial asset to collect contractual cashflows rather than to sell the asset before its maturity to realize its fairvaluechanges?
Downsides of fair value accounting include uncertainty in measurement, more judgment and subjective estimates required by managers, and potential bias in information
1. Record interest revenue and amortization of premiums/discounts during the reporting period
2. At the end of the year, adjust the amortized cost to fair value with the unrealized holding gains/losses reported in other comprehensive income (OCI)
1. As soon as cash is paid the company credits Interest Receivable and debits Cash
2. Held-for-Collection and Selling (HFCS) debt investments are reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income
3. Debt investments held for trading are reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in net income
4. Companies can choose the fair value option to account for debt investments, reporting all gains and losses in net income
5. Impairment of debt investments measured at amortized cost is recognized using the expected credit loss approach, with write-downs included in net income
6. Reversal of impairment losses on debt investments measured at amortized cost are recorded by debiting the Allowance for Impaired Debt Investments account and crediting Recovery of Impairment Loss
7. Impairment of debt investments classified as Held-for-Collection and Selling (HFCS) uses a different model, with details not required
If an investment is impaired, that is, there is "objective evidence" (e.g., financial difficulties) that the PV is below the carrying value, the carrying value has to be written down
If the impairment loss subsequently decreases, some or all of the previously recognized impairment loss shall be reversed, with a debit to the Allowance for Impaired Debt Investments account and a credit to Recovery of Impairment Loss
Reversal of impairment losses should not result in a carrying amount of the investment that exceeds the amortized cost that would have been reported had the impairment not been recognized