- (Thornley et al, 2003) reviewed studies comparing effects of chloropromazine to control conditions
- data from 13 trials and 1121 participants showed chloropromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity as compared to a placebo
- (Meltzer, 2012) concluded clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other typical antipsychotics
- it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed
- (Healy, 2012) suggested serious flaws with evidence for effectiveness
- e.g. most studies are short-term effects only and some successful trials had their data published multipletimes, exaggerating the size of evidence base for positive effects
- antipsychotics also have powerful calming effects so it is easy to demonstrate a positive effect on people experiencing symptoms of schizophrenia
- this isn't the same as reducing the severity of psychosis
- the understanding of how antipsychotics work is closely tied to the original dopamine hypothesis (schizophrenia is linked to hyperdopaminergia in the subcortex of the brain)
- the original hypothesis is not a complete alternative for schizophrenia (hypodopaminergia is also cited as cause for schizophrenia)
- if this is true then antipsychotics shouldn't work; give that there are questions about the effectiveness of antipsychotics anyway this adds to the argument that they are ineffective
- (Moncrieff, 2013) it has been argued in hospital situations to calm people with schizophrenia and make them easier for staff to manage rather than benefiting patients
- it could also be argued that calming people experiencing hallucinations and delusions almost certainly makes them feel better
- calming patients also allows them to engage with other treatments (e.g. cognitive behaviour therapy)