Devolution was included in Labour's 1997 election manifesto. After winning the election, referendums were held in each of the proposed devolved regions.
Parliament passed the Scotland Act 1998, Northern Ireland Act 1998, Government of Wales Act 1998 and the Greater London Authority Act 1999 to implement the referendum results
COVID allowed devolution to become far more visible and high profile due to their announcements and policy decisions
Education is a good example of differing policies between devolved bodies as in England students have to pay above 9,000 a year whereas in Scotland tuition is free. Northern Ireland and Wales also offer grants to students where England do not
Health policy also differs as all devolved bodies have free prescriptions where England doesn't. Also, Scotland have free long-term care for the elderly
Arguments that Devolution is positive include:
Far more effective representation, devolved bodies can respond to electorate concerns. E.G. COVID policies
Devolved bodies have more representative electoral systems. Scotland + Wales(AMS), Northern Ireland (STV)
The powers can be removed from devolved bodies if needed as parliament is sovereign
Arguments that Devolution is negative include:
Devolution undermines parliamentary sovereignty as it takes decision making power away from England
Turnout is low in devolved assembly elections, e.g. 46% in Northern Ireland 2022 shows they don't need it
Devolution undermines equal citizenship as Scottish residents have more government support
Arguments that Devolution is positive for unity include:
Devolution has satisfied demands for self-governance without breaking up the UK
Provided framework for peace in Northern Ireland
Increases in support for independence can be down to failure of conservative governments instead of devolution
Arguments that Devolution is positive for unity include:
Asymmetric nature of devolution results in citizens having different levels of representations
Devolution has fueled increased nationalism and calls for independence by showing the devolved bodies that they have the ability to govern themselves
Relations between devolved bodies and UK government have been strained, with tensions and lack of cooperation
Arguments that devolution has had a positive economic and policy impact:
Some policies in devolved bodies, e.g. ban on smoking in public places, have been adopted across the whole of the UK
Allowed for policy that reflects local interests, can be seen in policy divergences over COVID, Healthcare and education
Devolution has led to more effective policy making, e.g. in Greater Manchester greater control over health policy has led to increases in life expectancy
Arguments that devolution has had a negative economic and policy impact:
Devolvement has caused some devolved bodies to fall behind. e.g. Scotland's student assessment ranking has dropped
Undermines equal citizenship as different citizens have different access to healthcare, education etc and different laws
Some devolved governments, e.g. SNP, care more about independence than policy-making
Arguments for further devolution include:
Devolved bodies have proved they can run public services and decide policy
Brexit allows policy areas that were given to the EU to devolved bodies
Further devolution may discourage independence calls
Arguments against further devolution include:
Undermines equal citizenship
Devolved bodies already hold significant powers and there is little demand for further devolution
Devolved bodies have failed to prove the economic and political effects of devolution