The basicrights of citizens are protected. There is freedom of food, clothing, shelter. Even, the choices of work, religion, etc. are not controlled. None can compel him or prevent him in these aspects.
Any person found guilty is to be punished by law. Be it a poor man or the rich, strong, or weak will have to undergo the same punishment and judicial trial. Also, to get into any position, all the people will have to follow the sameprocedures.
Due to the freedom of life, a person can work withoutcompulsions, This enables him to perform with passion in any field he desires. With this work of passion, there would be enhanced performance and growth.
For every issue, the entire representatives of people are responsible. Everyone will be involved in decision making. This limits the chances of wrong decisions for the country. Thereby everyone is safe and in agreement with happenings with the nation.
In autocratic rule, there are chances for misuse of power. None can question their actions, hence, people in power can take personal decisions. This happens sometimes based on their individual needs and wishes. So, they can take decisions even if it is harmful to the entire masses. But in a democracy such misuse of power is not possible. Even a president or prime minister has to take his colleagues into consideration. He must put his views into practice only after their approval.
Most countries with democracy have enormous economic growth. As governance is a collective effort; the economic growth is never hindered. The nation growth is done collectively and efficiently.
The chances of violence are minimal in democracy. Since the power transition is smooth by-elections; the chances of violence are low. The only way to get into power is through peoples' trust. So, the persons will have to behave responsibly.
In the case of calamities, people are deprived of basic amenities like food. The government will have to arrange for food and essentials from other places. This is done to support the public and win their support. So, the suffering of people due to famines would be low.
Since all are equal by law, the systems are transparent. Results of elections, competitive exams, job selections are kept transparent. These lead to better support those with ability and talent.
In autocratic rule or kingship, the power transit to children. Despite not being capable enough, they can have complete power. This leads to insufficient administration and lack of long-term prosperity. In a democracy, only those with credible performance records would be given a chance. The right person with ability will be in the position to administer or the governance.
The finances of the state have to be spent as per the constitution. This prevents misuse of funds and uses them only for the benefit of citizens. So, the chances of corruption can be reduced.
People can choose their leader irrespective of caste, creed, sex and even race. Even economically backward persons like Abraham Lincoln could become the president of the united states, women like Margaret. Thatcher prime minister of the UK, etc.
If a person in authority is not fit to rule, he can be replaced by elections. Many politicians who were felt unfit to govern were changed in the next elections. If they were fit, were given multiple chances to rule.
People are free to live their life as they wish without causing harm to others. This is a fundamental right provided by law. But still, there are also disadvantages of democracy which needs to be addressed.