If the minority keep to the same beliefs, both over time (diachronic synchrony) and between all individuals that form the minority (synchronic consistency), the majority then reassess the situation and consider the minority idea more carefully
The minority must show dedication and make personal sacrifices when facing a majority. This shows that they are not acting out of self interest and will also draw more attention to the cause, making the majority more likely to consider the view point (augmentation principle)
Whilst consistency of argument is important, too much consistency can be seen as dogmatic and rigid and may stop the majority moving over to the minority viewpoint. Members of the minority need to be prepared to adapt their point of view and accept reasonable counter-arguments
Created a mock jury situation to decide on amount of compensation to be paid to someone involved in a ski lift accident. When a Confederate put forward an alternative pov and refused to change his position no effect on other group members. However a confedeate who compromised did have an influence on rest of the group
Moscovicis research lacks mundane realism
Unrealistic task of stating the colour of a slide. Therefore it is difficult to generalise findings to explain how minorities attempt to change majority opinion in real social situations e.g a jury deciding on a verdict whereby the outcomes are vastly important. Decreases usefulness
Wendy Wood et Al
Carried out a meta analysis of almost 100 similar studies and found minorities seen as being the most consistent were most influential